Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 29;17(6):e86956.
doi: 10.7759/cureus.86956. eCollection 2025 Jun.

Evaluating Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Outcomes in the Management of Common Bile Duct Stones With a Focus on Difficult Stones: A Retrospective Single-Center Study on Bile Duct Navigation From Kashmir, North India

Affiliations

Evaluating Endoscopic Retrograde Cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) Outcomes in the Management of Common Bile Duct Stones With a Focus on Difficult Stones: A Retrospective Single-Center Study on Bile Duct Navigation From Kashmir, North India

Shaheen Nazir et al. Cureus. .

Abstract

Background: Biliary tract diseases place a significant burden on healthcare in Kashmir. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is the gold standard for managing common bile duct stones (CBDS). However, challenging CBDS present considerable obstacles and complicate patient care, highlighting the necessity for specialized expertise and collaborative approaches. This study evaluates the effectiveness and safety of ERCP in treating CBDS, particularly focusing on difficult-to-manage cases, at a tertiary care center in the Kashmir region of North India. Objective: This study aimed to investigate the therapeutic outcomes and safety profile of ERCP in CBDS management, emphasizing exploring optimal strategies and modalities for successfully removing complex and difficult-to-treat stones. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted on ERCPs performed between March 2024 and March 2025 at Sher-i-Kashmir Institute of Medical Sciences (SKIMS) in Srinagar, Kashmir, India. The efficacy of ERCP in clearing CBDS was assessed, and complications were noted. Patients with large (≥1.5 cm) stones of difficult morphology, such as barrel or square-shaped, or those with hard consistency, or those associated with stricture/narrowing seen on prior imaging or cholangiogram were classified as having "difficult" stones. A retrospective review of medical records analyzed patients with CBDS who underwent ERCP, evaluating procedure success, complications, and outcomes, with a focus on effectiveness in difficult CBD.

Results: The study achieved an overall CBDS clearance rate of 650/682 (95.3%), with a clearance rate of 160/190 (84.2%) for difficult stones. For difficult stones, endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (EPLBD) alone was successful in 117/190 (61.5%) cases. Additional interventions, including mechanical lithotripsy (ML) in 18/190 (9.4%) cases, extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy (ESWL) in 13/190 (6.8%) cases, and electrohydraulic lithotripsy (EHL) in 12/190 (6.3%) cases, were required. The overall success rates for these interventions were as follows: EPLBD 117/175 (66.8%), ML 18/30 (60%), ESWL 13/20 (65%), and EHL 12/13 (92.3%). Surgical intervention was required in 30/190 (15.7%) cases. Complications occurred in 82 (12%) of overall cases and 13 (6.8%) of difficult stone cases.

Conclusion: In conclusion, our findings underscore the value of ERCP in managing CBDS, particularly challenging ones, with high efficacy and an acceptable safety profile. This supports its continued use as a primary treatment option for complex CBDS. While complications related to ERCP do occur, they are primarily associated with sphincterotomy/precut procedures for gaining access to the CBD. Notably, managing difficult stones does not appear to increase the complication rate, further strengthening ERCP's role in the treatment of complex biliary cases.

Keywords: common bile duct stones (cbds); difficult cbd stone; electrohydraulic (ehl); endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation (eplbd); endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ercp); mechanical lithotripsy (ml).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Human subjects: Informed consent for treatment and open access publication was obtained or waived by all participants in this study. Animal subjects: All authors have confirmed that this study did not involve animal subjects or tissue. Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Distribution of modalities used to manage difficult stones shown as n (%)
ERCP: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography; EHL: electrohydraulic lithotripsy; ML: mechanical lithotripsy; EPLBD: endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation; ESWL: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy
Figure 2
Figure 2. A case where EPLBD was used to manage difficult stones. Black arrow shows the large stone, yellow arrow shows the extraction balloon, red arrow shows the EPLBD, and green arrow shows the occlusive cholangiogram revealing clear CBD
EPLBD: endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation; CBD: common bile duct
Figure 3
Figure 3. A case where ML was used to manage difficult stones. Red arrow shows the large stone, green arrow shows the EPLBD, blue arrow shows the ML, and white arrow shows the occlusive cholangiogram revealing clear CBD
ML: mechanical lithotripsy; EPLBD: endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation; CBD: common bile duct
Figure 4
Figure 4. Placement of NBD followed by ESWL. Black arrow shows the large stone, yellow arrow shows the guidewire placed in CBD during ERCP, red arrow shows the NBD, blue arrow shows the pulverized stone after ESWL, and green arrow shows the occlusive cholangiogram revealing clear CBD
NBD: nasobiliary drainage; ESWL: extracorporeal shock wave lithotripsy; CBD: common bile duct; ERCP: endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography
Figure 5
Figure 5. EHL. Black arrow shows the large stone, yellow arrow shows the EPLBD, blue arrow shows the EHL targeting stone, pink arrow shows the pulverized stone, and white arrow shows the occlusive cholangiogram revealing clear CBD
EHL: electrohydraulic lithotripsy; EPLBD: endoscopic papillary large balloon dilation; CBD: common bile duct

Similar articles

References

    1. Updated guideline on the management of common bile duct stones (CBDS) Williams E, Beckingham I, El Sayed G, Gurusamy K, Sturgess R, Webster G, Young T. Gut. 2017;66:765–782. - PubMed
    1. Optimizing choledocholithiasis management: a cost-effectiveness analysis. Poulose BK, Speroff T, Holzman MD. Arch Surg. 2007;142:43–48. - PubMed
    1. Endoscopic management of difficult common bile duct stones. Trikudanathan G, Navaneethan U, Parsi MA. World J Gastroenterol. 2013;19:165–173. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cracking difficult biliary stones. Angsuwatcharakon P, Rerknimitr R. Clin Endosc. 2021;54:660–668. - PMC - PubMed
    1. To study the safety and efficacy of ERCP and biliary stenting in the management of difficult common bile duct (CBD) stones in elderly patients. Ahmad SS, Akhter S, Altaf SH. https://academicmed.org/Uploads/Volume5Issue2/357.%20[372.%20JAMP_Yadav_... Int J Acad Med Pharm. 2023;5:1712–1716.

LinkOut - more resources