Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 22:86:103358.
doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2025.103358. eCollection 2025 Aug.

Safety, tolerability and clinical effects of rovunaptabin, also known as BC007 on fatigue and quality of life in patients with Post-COVID syndrome (reCOVer): a prospective, exploratory, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised phase IIa clinical trial (RCT)

Affiliations

Safety, tolerability and clinical effects of rovunaptabin, also known as BC007 on fatigue and quality of life in patients with Post-COVID syndrome (reCOVer): a prospective, exploratory, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised phase IIa clinical trial (RCT)

Bettina Hohberger et al. EClinicalMedicine. .

Abstract

Background: Rovunaptabin neutralises functional autoantibodies targeting G-Protein coupled receptors (GPCR-fAAbs), observed in patients with Post-COVID syndrome. As we hypothesise an improvement of PCS by rovunaptabin, the aim of reCOVer was to investigate safety, tolerability, and clinical effects of rovunaptabin in PCS patients.

Methods: reCOVer is a prospective, exploratory, placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomised phase IIa clinical investigator initiated trial with 1350 mg rovunaptabin with additional cross-over at the Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Germany. The trial was registered in EudraCT, 2022-001781-35. Screening was done between 21·11·2023 and 25·06·2024. Eligible participants (18-80 years) showed GPCR-fAAbs, at least 3/8 defined PCS symptoms persisting ≥3 months after COVID-19 and fatigue as major symptom. Participants were randomly assigned (1:1) to either receive rovunaptabin or placebo at day 0 (d0) and d48 with a follow-up of 28 days, respectively. Primary endpoint was the number of treatment emergent adverse events (TEAE) at d28 (co-primary endpoint: TEAE at d70); secondary endpoint focused on fatigue and quality of life.

Findings: Thirty PCS patients were randomised and analysed. RCT analysis showed nine (rovunaptabin) and five TEAEs (placebo), yet without statistically significance (p = 0·1299; CI -14·80%; 63·02%); one serious adverse event, not related to treatment, was recorded. Rovunaptabin showed a neutralisation of GPCR-fAAb and a significant improvement of FACIT Fatigue Scale (effect size = 2·10, p = 0·0378), Bell score (effect size = 3·64, p = 0·0004), Fatigue Severity Scale (effect size = -2·66, p = 0·0088), and quality of life (4/8 items).

Interpretation: As this proof-of-concept study showed effects on the patient-centred endpoint PCS and a good safety profil, subsequent studies are needed to confirm these results in a larger cohort.

Funding: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, German Research Foundation.

Keywords: Fatigue; Functional autoantibody; GPCR; GPCR-fAAb; Long-COVID; PCS subtypes; Post-COVID syndrome; Quality of life; Rovunaptabin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

BH and MH declare conflict of interests; BH: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01EP2108A, reCOVer, research grant; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01EO2105, iIMMUNE_ACS, research grant; German Research Foundation (DFG) 401821119/GRK2504, research grant; German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) 01EJ2409, FAME, research grant; The Bavarian Health and Food Safety Authority (LGL) K1-2497-Projekte-22-V9-D51632/2022, uncover, research grant; German Federal Ministry of Health (BMG) Post-COVID Meeting, Berlin 25·11·2024; Member of the German S1 Guideline Long-/Post-COVID; MH: German Federal Ministry of Education and Research, BMBF 01EJ2409, FAME, Subproject no. 5, research grant; the other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Trial profile. The population included all treated participants who received at least one administration of the study drug. The population enrolled was randomised by our study pharmacy of the Universitätsklinikum Erlangen. Randomised participants passed all study inclusion or exclusion criteria. Before the infusion of either rovunaptabin (dosage: 1350 mg) or placebo PCS patients had to undergo a gargle water PCR-COVID-test in order to exclude acute SARS-CoV-2 infections. RCT: patients received either rovunaptabin/placebo on their 2nd visit with seven visits as follow-up; cross-over: patients received rovunaptabin–placebo or placebo–rovunaptabin at the 8th visit with 7 visits as follow-up. In total 14 visits were planned for each study-participant. RCT: missing visits n = 1 (rovunaptabin group); missing visits n = 0 (placebo group); cross-over: missing visits n = 2 (rovunaptabin–placebo); missing visits n = 2 (placebo–rovunaptabin); total missing visits were n = 5; for the primary variable TAE all documented TAEs were analysed regardless of drop-out or no missing visits. 1One patient did not receive rovunaptabin due to an adverse event after placebo administration.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Fatigue scores assessed at V2, V4, V5, V6, and V7. (A) FACIT scores, (B) Bell scores, and (C) FSS mean scores of study participants. Depicted are medians with IQR and ranges. Means are shown as crosses. (D) SF36 vitality scores, (E) SF36 General Health scores, (F) SF36 social functioning scores, and (G) SF36 mental component summary scores of study participants. Depicted are medians with IQR and ranges. Means are shown as crosses. Sequence A n V2–V6 = 14, n V7 = 13. Sequence B n V2–7 = 16. One patient in sequence A only received the first infusion (rovunaptabin) at V2 (ER28). One patient in sequence B only received the first infusion (placebo) at V2 (ER36).

References

    1. Soriano J.B., Murthy S., Marshall J.C., Relan P., Diaz J.V., WHO Clinical Case Definition Working Group on Post-COVID-19 Condition A clinical case definition of post-COVID-19 condition by a Delphi consensus. Lancet Infect Dis. 2022;22(4):E102–E107. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Parotto M., Gyongyosi M., Howe K., et al. Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19: understanding and addressing the burden of multisystem manifestations. Lancet Respir Med. 2023;11(8):739–754. - PubMed
    1. Greenhalgh T., Sivan M., Perlowski A., Nikolich J.Z. Long COVID: a clinical update. Lancet. 2024;404(10453):707–724. - PubMed
    1. Proal A.D., VanElzakker M.B. Long COVID or post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC): an overview of biological factors that may contribute to persistent symptoms. Front Microbiol. 2021;12 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kell D.B., Laubscher G.J., Pretorius E. A central role for amyloid fibrin microclots in long COVID/PASC: origins and therapeutic implications. Biochem J. 2022;479(4):537–559. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources