Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep;28(3):411-424.
doi: 10.1007/s11019-025-10283-6. Epub 2025 Jul 30.

Integrating ethics in digital mental healthcare technologies: a principle-based empirically grounded roadmap approach

Affiliations

Integrating ethics in digital mental healthcare technologies: a principle-based empirically grounded roadmap approach

Wanda Spahl et al. Med Health Care Philos. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Digital mental healthcare technologies increasingly incorporate gamification, yet relevant ethical considerations remain underexamined. This paper introduces the Principle-Based Empirically Grounded Roadmap Approach (PERA), a methodological contribution to empirical bioethics. It has evolved from ethics research within the Horizon Europe project ASPbelong, which designs a collaboratively played augmented reality intervention for adolescents. PERA refines existing integrated empirical bioethics methodologies by responding to three key characteristics of the use case: a largely predetermined technology with a relatively low degree of openness in technological design, embedded co-development practices led by facilitators from within the project team, and planned future iterations beyond the ethics team's involvement. PERA integrates mapping of principles from the ethics literature, a scoping review of the moral intuitions of developers of comparable technologies, and the collection of original empirical data on the use case. Using abductive reasoning, these insights are synthesized into a tangible output: an ethics roadmap designed to guide and be adapted in future use case iterations. By advancing a methodology of combining normative reasoning with empirical insights on a concrete use case, this paper provides both practical tools for ethics researchers in technology projects and a means to generate empirically grounded conceptual contributions. Its outcomes, when brought into dialogue with findings from other integrated empirical bioethics research, can support the critical examination of broader assumptions and implications of gamified mental healthcare, including questions of good care and the broader social implications of such technologies.

Keywords: Applied ethics; Digital health; Empirical bioethics; Health apps; Methodology; Serious games; mHealth.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Playtesting of the Lina augmented reality smartphone experience at a Czech school (photo copyright: Evgeniia Tokmakova)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Work steps for creating the ethics roadmap

Similar articles

References

    1. Ahmadpour, Naseem, Geke Ludden, Dorian Peters, and Karina Vold. 2022. Editorial: Responsible Digital Health. Frontiers in Digital Health. 10.3389/fdgth.2021.841477. - PMC - PubMed
    1. ASPbelong. 2025. ‘Summarising 2024: Cultural Exchanges Accomplished!’ Updates (blog). Accessed 7 January 2025. https://www.augmentedsocialplay.com/updates/summarising-2024-cultural-ex...
    1. Baker, Robert. 2005. Getting Agreement: How Bioethics Got Started. Hastings Center Report 35 (3): 50–51. 10.1353/hcr.2005.0053.
    1. Balmer, Andrew S., Jane Calvert, Claire Marris, Susan Molyneux-Hodgson, Emma Frow, Matthew Kearnes, Kate Bulpin, Pablo Schyfter, Adrian Mackenzie, and Paul Martin. 2016. Five Rules of Thumb for Post-ELSI Interdisciplinary Collaborations. Journal of Responsible Innovation 3 (1): 73–80. 10.1080/23299460.2016.1177867.
    1. Beauchamp, Tom L., and James F. Childress. 2019. Principles of Biomedical Ethics, 8th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.

LinkOut - more resources