Real-world use of cenobamate in pediatric focal epilepsies and developmental epileptic encephalopathies: A multicenter retrospective series
- PMID: 40736694
- DOI: 10.1111/epi.18586
Real-world use of cenobamate in pediatric focal epilepsies and developmental epileptic encephalopathies: A multicenter retrospective series
Abstract
Objective: Cenobamate (CNB) is an anti-seizure medication approved for focal-onset seizures in adults, with growing evidence supporting its use in pediatric drug-resistant epilepsy (DRE). This study evaluates the efficacy, retention, and safety of CNB in children and adolescents, including those with developmental and epileptic encephalopathies (DEEs).
Methods: We conducted a retrospective, multicenter study of 169 pediatric patients (0-18 years) with DRE treated with CNB across centers in Spain. Seizure response (≥50% reduction) and seizure freedom (no seizures in the previous month) were assessed at 3, 6, and 12 months.
Results: At 12 months, CNB showed a retention rate of 89.2%, with 83.9% of patients achieving seizure response and 19.6% reaching seizure freedom. Response rates were 73.4% at 3 months and 77.1% at 6 months, with seizure freedom increasing from 11.8% at 3 months to 21.1% at 6 months. Outcomes were comparable between DEEs and focal epilepsies, indicating broad-spectrum efficacy. Seizure worsening occurred in 4.7% of patients, all with DEEs. After adjusting for seizure type, those patients with focal seizures had higher odds of achieving seizure response (odds ratio [OR] 95% confidence interval [95% CI] 5.46, 1.27-23.52; p = 0.02) and seizure freedom (OR 95% CI 5.32, 1.57-17.97; p < 0.01). Median CNB doses (mg/kg/day) were 1.78 (range 0.37-12.5), 2.5 (range 0.67-12.5), and 3.19 (range 0.96-9.09) at 3, 6, and 12 months, respectively. Adverse events occurred in 44.9% of patients, most commonly somnolence (42.3%) and dizziness (22.4%), which improved with slower titration.
Significance: CNB appears effective and well-tolerated in pediatric DRE, including DEE, with high retention and sustained efficacy over time. Adverse events were generally manageable with dose adjustments, and slow, weight-based titration improved tolerability. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm these findings.
Keywords: antiseizure medications; cenobamate; developmental and epileptic encephalopathies; focal seizures; pediatric epilepsy.
© 2025 International League Against Epilepsy.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Sperling MR, Klein P, Aboumatar S, Gelfand M, Halford JJ, Gregory LK, et al. Cenobamate (YKP3089) as adjunctive treatment for uncontrolled focal seizures in a large, phase 3, multicenter, open‐label safety study. Epilepsia. 2020;61:1099–1108. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/epi.16525
-
- Makridis KL, Bast T, Prager C, Kovacevic‐Preradovic T, Bittigau P, Mayer T, et al. Real‐world experience treating pediatric epilepsy patients with cenobamate. Front Neurol. 2022;13:950171. Available from: www.frontiersin.org
-
- Löscher W, Potschka H, Sisodiya SM, Vezzani A. Drug resistance in epilepsy: clinical impact, potential mechanisms, and new innovative treatment options. Pharmacol Rev. 2020;72(3):606. Available from: https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7300324/
-
- Brodie MJ, Barry SJE, Bamagous GA, Norrie JD, Kwan P. Patterns of treatment response in newly diagnosed epilepsy. Neurology. 2012;78(20):1548–1554. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/22573629/
-
- Laxer KD, Trinka E, Hirsch LJ, Cendes F, Langfitt J, Delanty N, et al. The consequences of refractory epilepsy and its treatment. Epilepsy Behav. 2014;37:59–70. Available from: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24980390/
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources