Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 30;20(7):e0328011.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328011. eCollection 2025.

Human exposure to PM10 microplastics in indoor air

Affiliations

Human exposure to PM10 microplastics in indoor air

Nadiia Yakovenko et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

The ubiquitous presence of airborne microplastics (MPs) in different indoor environments prompts serious concerns about the degree to which we inhale these particles and their potential impact on human health. Previous studies have mostly targeted MP in the 20-200 µm size range, which are less likely to efficiently penetrate into the lungs. In this study, we specifically investigate airborne, indoor suspended MPs in the inhalable 1-10 µm (MP1-10 µm) range in residential and car cabin environments, by using Raman spectroscopy. The median concentration of total suspended indoor MPs for the residential environment was 528 MPs/m3 and 2,238 MPs/m3 in the car cabin environment. The predominant polymer type in the residential environment was polyethylene (PE), and polyamide (PA) in the car cabin environment. Fragments were the dominant shape for 97% of the analyzed MPs, and 94% of MPs were smaller than 10 µm (MP1-10 µm), following a power size distribution law (the number of MP fragments increases exponentially as particle size decreases). We combine the new MP1-10 µm observations with published indoor MP data to derive a consensus indoor MP concentration distribution, which we use to estimate human adult indoor MP inhalation of 3,200 MPs/day for the 10-300 µm (MP10-300 µm) range, and 68,000 MPs/day for MP1-10 µm. The MP1-10 µm exposure estimates are 100-fold higher than previous estimates that were extrapolated from larger MP sizes, and suggest that the health impacts of MP inhalation may be more substantial than we realize.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Indoor total suspended MP concentration (MPs/m3) for all samples (n = 12), apartments (n = 7), and cars (n = 5).
Fig 2
Fig 2. MP polymer composition in indoor environments.
(A) Total suspended MP polymer composition observed in different indoor environments studied. (B) Raman spectrum of polyethylene (PE) particle (blue) and reference spectrum of PE (red). (C) Raman spectrum of polyamide (PA) particle (blue) and reference spectrum of PA (red).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Observed indoor suspended MP size distribution in apartments (n  = 7) and cars (n = 5).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Comparison of published indoor suspended MP concentrations in the 1–3,000 μm range.
FTIR microscopy typically probes MP > 20 μm, while Raman microscopy covers the MP1-10 μm range down to 1 μm. The power law fit includes all data, except for select data points with low bias for small MP near the detection limits (inflected distributions from Vianello et al. [32] and Xie et al. [29]; see S9 Fig). The MP concentration variability reflects both true environmental and method variability and shows an overall coherent estimate of human airborne MP exposure, described by the equation y = 5979x-2,331 (r2 of 0.86), and for standardized 1μm wide bins, meaning that the function returns the MP concentration in the 1–2 μm range, for an x value of 1.5 μm.

Similar articles

References

    1. Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL. Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Sci Adv. 2017;3(7):e1700782. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.1700782 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thompson RC, Olsen Y, Mitchell RP, Davis A, Rowland SJ, John AWG, et al. Lost at sea: where is all the plastic?. Science. 2004;304(5672):838. doi: 10.1126/science.1094559 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Phuong NN, Zalouk-Vergnoux A, Poirier L, Kamari A, Châtel A, Mouneyrac C, et al. Is there any consistency between the microplastics found in the field and those used in laboratory experiments?. Environ Pollut. 2016;211:111–23. doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2015.12.035 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cole M, Lindeque P, Halsband C, Galloway TS. Microplastics as contaminants in the marine environment: a review. Mar Pollut Bull. 2011;62(12):2588–97. doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2011.09.025 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu K, Wang X, Wei N, Song Z, Li D. Accurate quantification and transport estimation of suspended atmospheric microplastics in megacities: Implications for human health. Environ Int. 2019;132:105127. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105127 - DOI - PubMed