Brimonidine tartrate 0.15% drops to reduce low post-LASIK residual myopia: A retrospective study
- PMID: 40737267
- PMCID: PMC12310037
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0329364
Brimonidine tartrate 0.15% drops to reduce low post-LASIK residual myopia: A retrospective study
Abstract
Purpose: Residual myopia following Laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis (LASIK) surgery poses a significant concern, with existing literature extensively detailing the use of timolol for treatment. This study aims to assess prediction factors for brimonidine tartrate 0.15% (Alphagan-P) response on post-LASIK residual myopic refraction reduction.
Methods: The study included consecutive patients who received Alphagan-P during their follow-up for post-LASIK residual myopia.
Results: We included 61 patients (55% male) with a mean age of 35.18 ± 10.13 Alphagan-P Treatment started at a mean of 4.94 ± 5.64 months after surgery for residual myopia of -0.53 ± 0.71D. Comparison analysis of patients who responded (n = 32, 51.6%) to patients who did not (n = 30, 48.4%) shows that responders were older (38.1 ± 9.1 vs. 32.3 ± 10.3, p = 0.03), had higher baseline myopic Spherical equivalent (SE, -0.82 ± 0.65 vs. -0.26 ± 0.66 p < 0.01), and lower uncorrected visual acuity (Uncorrected visual acuity [UCVA], 0.14 ± 0.2 vs. -0.003 ± 0.12 p = 0.01). Multiple Binary logistic regression confirmed these predictors for response (UCVA (OR=70.6, P = .006), larger SE (OR=3.8, P = .004,) and older age (OR=1.06, P = .03)).
Conclusions: Alphagan-P can reduce up to 0.5D of post-LASIK residual myopia in roughly 50% of subjects. This treatment might be recommended to fine-tune outcomes for low residual myopia.
Copyright: © 2025 Gomel et al. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures

Similar articles
-
Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) for correcting myopia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Feb 15;2(2):CD011080. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011080.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28197998 Free PMC article.
-
Laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy (LASEK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for correction of myopia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Feb 22;2(2):CD009799. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009799.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. PMID: 26899152 Free PMC article.
-
Laser-assisted in-situ keratomileusis (LASIK) versus photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) for myopia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jan 31;2013(1):CD005135. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005135.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013. PMID: 23440799 Free PMC article.
-
Small Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) versus Femtosecond Laser-Assisted In Situ Keratomileusis (FS-LASIK) for Myopia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.PLoS One. 2016 Jul 1;11(7):e0158176. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158176. eCollection 2016. PLoS One. 2016. PMID: 27367803 Free PMC article.
-
[Toric-ICL shows better predictability and efficacy than FS-LASIK for myopia correction in patients with moderate to high myopia and astigmatism].Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2025 Jun 20;45(6):1113-1121. doi: 10.12122/j.issn.1673-4254.2025.06.01. Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2025. PMID: 40579125 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Duvdevan N, Mimouni M, Dominitz Y, Sela T, Munzer G, Achiron A, et al. Flap protection during laser-assisted in situ keratomileusis improves refractive outcomes in high myopic astigmatism. cleverjournal. 2019;2(1):11–7. doi: 10.15713/ins.clever.22 - DOI
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources