Outcomes following different upfront stem cell transplantation strategies for multiple myeloma: a statistical perspective on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT
- PMID: 40739129
- DOI: 10.1038/s41409-025-02675-2
Outcomes following different upfront stem cell transplantation strategies for multiple myeloma: a statistical perspective on behalf of the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT
Abstract
Multiple myeloma (MM) is a heterogenous malignant disease. Novel agents including bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells have improved response rates and patient outcome, but the majority of patients ultimately still relapse. High dose chemotherapy followed by autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HCT) remains standard care of treatment for transplant-eligible patients. While single auto-HCT is commonly used, a planned tandem auto-HCT or auto-allo approach remains controversial, based on conflicting results from clinical trials. Here we compared the outcome of 24,936 MM patients aged between 20 and 65 years who underwent first auto-HCT during 2002-2015, reported to the EBMT registry, of whom 3683 and 878 got tandem auto-HCT and auto-allo-HCT respectively. We used non-standard statistical approaches to account for time-dependence of treatments and of their effects, including models with multiple timescales and dynamic prediction. Differences were reported by graphs of hazard functions, hazard ratios and conditional probabilities over time. For both OS and PFS, there was a limited but persistent advantage for the tandem auto-HCT group compared to single auto-HCT, and a clear advantage for the auto-allo-HCT group over both other strategies in the longer term, albeit at the cost of higher early mortality.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This manuscript follows the relevant guidelines and regulations as appropriate. The study is based on the EBMT registry data. EBMT centers commit to obtain informed consent according to the local regulations applicable at the time of transplantation in order to report pseudonymized data to the EBMT. All EBMT Registry studies are performed under the supervision of the EBMT Working Parties. This study was approved by the Chronic Malignancies Working Party of the EBMT.
References
-
- Moreau P, Hulin C, Perrot A, Arnulf B, Belhadj K, Benboubker L, et al. Bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab and followed by daratumumab maintenance or observation in transplant-eligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: long-term follow-up of the CASSIOPEIA randomised controlled phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2024;25:1003–14. - PubMed
-
- Rees MJ, D’Agostino M, Leypoldt LB, Kumar S, Weisel KC, Gay F. Navigating high-risk and ultrahigh-risk multiple myeloma: challenges and emerging strategies. Am Soc Clin Oncol Educ Book. 2024;44:e433520. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources