Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 30;26(1):704.
doi: 10.1186/s12864-025-11801-9.

Candidate imprinting control regions in dog genome

Affiliations

Candidate imprinting control regions in dog genome

Phillip Wyss et al. BMC Genomics. .

Abstract

In mammals, genomic imprinting restricts the expression of a subset of genes from one of the two parental alleles. The process is regulated by imprinting control regions (ICRs) dispersed across autosomal chromosomal DNA. An unresolved question is how to discover candidate ICRs across the entire canine genome. Previously, bioinformatics analyses found a significant fraction of well-known ICRs in mouse, human, and Bos taurus. Analyses were based on finding the genomic positions of clusters of several CpG-rich motifs known as ZFBS-morph overlaps. These motifs are composite DNA elements. For this report, we performed similar studies to pinpoint candidate ICRs in the dog genome. A key feature of the bioinformatics approach is creating density plots to mark cluster positions as peaks. In genome-wide analyses, peaks in plots effectively discovered candidate ICRs along chromosomal DNA sequences of the Canis familiaris breed Boxer. With respect to Non-Dog RefSeq Genes, several candidate ICRs are in regions analogous to ICR positions in mouse DNA, in human DNA, or both. In the Boxer genome, examples include candidate ICRs for parent-of-origin-specific expression of the MEST isoform PEG1, INPP5F_V2, the PLAGL1 isoform ZAC1, IGF2R, PEG3, and GNAS loci. In mouse, imprinted genes in these loci play important roles in developmental and physiological processes.

Keywords: Canis familiaris; Allele-specific; Canine; CpG; DMR; Dog genome; Gene regulation; Genome-wide; ICR; Imprinted genes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: The research did not include human or animal subjects. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Candidate ICR for allele-specific expression of MEST isoform (PEG1) in the Boxer genome. On the genome browser, genomic landmarks are displayed on horizonal lines known as tracks. A track, colored green, gives the positions of CpG islands in the Boxer genome. A custom track, maroon color, displays peak position in density plots. In hunter green are tracks for viewing the positions of ZFBS-morph overlaps (ZMOs), in pack format, and ZFP57 hexamers in dense format. Tracks in dark blue displays Non-Dog RefSeq Genes. In density-plots, a peak located a candidate ICR in a CpG island (CpG174)
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Candidate ICR for allele-specific expression of PLAGL1 isoform (ZAC1) in the Boxer genome. From top to bottom: the positions of CpG islands, in pack format; density-plot, in full format; ZFBS-morph overlap (ZMOs), in pack format; ZFP57 hexameric sites, in dense format; and Non-Dog RefSeq Genes, in pack format. The candidate ICR is marked by a robust peak in CpG137
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Candidate ICR for allele-specific expression of INPP5F_V2 in the Boxer genome. From top to bottom: the positions of CpG islands; density plot; ZFBS-morph overlaps (ZMOs); ZFP57 hexameric sites; and Non-Dog RefSeq Genes. The candidate ICR is marked by a robust peak in CpG153. In the context of studies of mice and humans, the ICR is intronic and at a correct position
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Candidate ICR for allele specific expression of PEG3/ZIM2 in the Boxer genome. From top to bottom: the positions of CpG islands; density plot; ZFBS-morph overlaps (ZMOs); ZFP57 hexameric sites; and Non-Dog RefSeq Genes. The robust peak marks the candidate ICR location. In the context of studies of humans, candidate ICR position is correct
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Candidate ICR in the GNAS complex locus in the Boxer genome. From top to bottom: the positions of CpG islands; density plot; ZFBS-morph overlaps; ZFP57 binding sites (ZMOs); and Non-Dog RefSeq Genes. The robust peak marks the likely position of a candidate for principal ICR in GNAS complex locus in Boxer
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Candidate ICR for allele specific expression of IGF2R in the Boxer genome. From top to bottom: the positions of CpG islands; density plot; ZFBS-morph overlaps (ZMOs); ZFP57 hexameric sites; and Non-Dog RefSeq Genes. The candidate ICR is intronic and marked by a robust peak
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
H19 locus in Boxer genome. From top to bottom: the positions of H19, CpG islands, ZFBS-morph overlaps (ZMOs), and hexameric sequence. Upstream H19, the approach did not find a candidate ICR for regulating allele-specific expression in Boxer DNA. the region includes 3 ZFBS-morph overlaps (ZMOs), and several hexameric site

Similar articles

References

    1. Parker HG, Shearin AL, Ostrander EA. Man’s best friend becomes biology’s best in show: genome analyses in the domestic dog. Annu Rev Genet. 2010;44:309–36. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ideraabdullah FY, Vigneau S, Bartolomei MS. Genomic imprinting mechanisms in mammals. Mutat Res. 2008;647(1–2):77–85. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Tucci V, Isles AR, Kelsey G, Ferguson-Smith AC, Erice Imprinting G. Genomic imprinting and physiological processes in mammals. Cell. 2019;176(5):952–65. - PubMed
    1. Proudhon C, Bourc’his D. [Evolution of genomic imprinting in mammals: what a zoo!]. Med Sci (Paris). 2010;26(5):497–503. - PubMed
    1. Radford EJ, Ferron SR, Ferguson-Smith AC. Genomic imprinting as an adaptative model of developmental plasticity. FEBS Lett. 2011;585(13):2059–66. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources