Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 30;25(1):556.
doi: 10.1186/s12872-025-05024-9.

The lack of evidence-based management in electrical storm: a scoping review

Affiliations

The lack of evidence-based management in electrical storm: a scoping review

Pouya Motazedian et al. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. .

Abstract

Electrical storm (ES) is associated with a significant risk of morbidity and mortality. Despite this, there has been limited research in ES resulting in uncertainty and inconsistency in the management of this life-threatening condition. The objective of this scoping review was to define the current body of literature evaluating pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic therapies used in the management of ES. A comprehensive search of Medline, CENTRAL and Embase was completed on January 11, 2025. Primary studies on pharmacotherapies in ES were included if they reported therapy-related outcomes and included ≥ 5 adult patients. A total of 45 studies met the inclusion criteria. Four studies were randomized control trials (three trials had overlapping cohorts) and the remaining were observational studies. Amiodarone, quinidine, landiolol, isoproterenol, and mexiletine were the most studied medications. The use of sedation for ES was exclusively studied in the context of mechanical ventilation. There was an increase in the number of ES studies over time, but sample sizes remained small and unchanged. Existing evidence to guide the management of ES is predominantly based on small observational studies. High quality data to inform the management of ES is needed.

Keywords: Electrical storm; Evidence-based medicine; Pharmacologic management; Ventricular tachycardia.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Prisma Flow Diagram
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Trend of the number of published studies over time. The solid line is the trend in the number of published studies over time
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Temporal trends in sample size over time. The dashed line is the trend in sample size over time

References

    1. Motazedian P, et al. Efficacy of stellate ganglion block in treatment of electrical storm: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Sci Rep. 2024;14:24719. 10.1038/s41598-024-76663-9. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jentzer JC, et al. Multidisciplinary critical care management of electrical storm: JACC State-of-the-Art review. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2023;81:2189–206. 10.1016/j.jacc.2023.03.424. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Exner DV, et al. Electrical storm presages nonsudden death: the antiarrhythmics versus implantable defibrillators (AVID) trial. Circulation. 2001;103:2066–71. 10.1161/01.cir.103.16.2066. - PubMed
    1. Bänsch D, et al. Clusters of ventricular tachycardias signify impaired survival in patients with idiopathic dilated cardiomyopathy and implantable cardioverter defibrillators. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2000;36:566–73. 10.1016/s0735-1097(00)00726-9. - PubMed
    1. Credner SC, Klingenheben T, Mauss O, Sticherling C, Hohnloser SH. Electrical storm in patients with transvenous implantable cardioverter-defibrillators: incidence, management and prognostic implications. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1998;32:1909–15. 10.1016/s0735-1097(98)00495-1. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources