Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 30;11(1):223.
doi: 10.1038/s41531-025-01090-0.

Effect of high, low, and asymmetric frequency subthalamic stimulation on speech and voice in Parkinson's disease: a randomized trial

Affiliations

Effect of high, low, and asymmetric frequency subthalamic stimulation on speech and voice in Parkinson's disease: a randomized trial

Zhitong Zeng et al. NPJ Parkinsons Dis. .

Abstract

While bilateral high-frequency subthalamic nucleus stimulation (Bi-HFS) frequently worsens speech in Parkinson's disease (PD), low-frequency stimulation (LFS) may alleviate gait deficits but lacks robust evidence for speech benefits. This randomized trial compared Bi-LFS (60 Hz) and Bi-HFS (130 Hz) in 33 PD patients with postural instability/gait difficulty (PIGD), and evaluated asymmetric frequency stimulation (AFS) in 20 patients. Bi-LFS significantly improved dysphonia severity index (DSI, FDR-p = 0.024), maximum phonation time (MPT, FDR- p = 0.025), and subjective speech ratings compared to Bi-HFS. Left-LFS/right-HFS (L-LFS/R-HFS) matched Bi-LFS efficacy and surpassed Bi-HFS in objective measures (FDR-p ≤ 0.021). Speech improvements correlated with motor/gait gains, independent of tremor. Findings suggest Bi-LFS mitigates speech dysfunction in PIGD-PD, with left-sided LFS potentially driving benefits, while AFS provides comparable outcomes. These data support tailored stimulation protocols to optimize speech in PD. The National Medical Research Registration and Information System of China (MR-31-23-036810).

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Flowchart of study design.
Stim-off, stimulation turned off; Bi, bilateral; HFS, high frequency stimulation; LFS, low frequency stimulation; AFS, asymmetric frequency stimulation; L left; R, right; ES, Evaluation session.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Voice and speech outcomes across Stim-off, Bi-HFS, and Bi-LFS conditions in Experiment Part I.
Stim-off, stimulation turned off; Bi, bilateral; HFS, high frequency stimulation; LFS, low frequency stimulation.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Voice and speech outcomes across Stim-off, Bi-HFS, Bi-LFS and AFS conditions in Experiment part II.
Stim-off, stimulation turned off; Bi, bilateral; HFS, high frequency stimulation; LFS, low frequency stimulation; AFS, asymmetric frequency stimulation; L left; R, right.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4. Correlation between motor and acoustic parameter changes across different stimulation conditions.
*, p < 0.05; ** p < 0.01; ***, p < 0.001; ****, p < 0.0001.

References

    1. Rusz, J. et al. Defining speech subtypes in De Novo Parkinson disease: response to long-term levodopa therapy. Neurology97, e2124–e2135 (2021). - PubMed
    1. Bobin, M. et al. Direct subthalamic nucleus stimulation influences speech and voice quality in Parkinson’s disease patients. Brain Stimulation17, 112–124 (2024). - PubMed
    1. Cao, F. et al. Speech and language biomarkers for Parkinson’s disease prediction, early diagnosis and progression. npj Parkinsons Dis.11, 57 (2025). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ma, A., Lau, K. K. & Thyagarajan, D. Voice changes in Parkinson’s disease: What are they telling us?. J. Clin. Neurosci.72, 1–7 (2020). - PubMed
    1. Mu, L. et al. Mechanisms of swallowing, speech and voice disorders in Parkinson’s disease: literature review with our first evidence for the periperal nervous system involvement. Dysphagia39, 1001–1012 (2024). - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources