Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Oct;31(10):3504-3513.
doi: 10.1038/s41591-025-03843-z. Epub 2025 Jul 30.

Precemtabart tocentecan, an anti-CEACAM5 antibody-drug conjugate, in metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 1 trial

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Precemtabart tocentecan, an anti-CEACAM5 antibody-drug conjugate, in metastatic colorectal cancer: a phase 1 trial

Scott Kopetz et al. Nat Med. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

CEACAM5, a cell surface protein, is overexpressed in colorectal cancer (CRC). Precemtabart tocentecan (Precem-TcT, previously M9140) is an anti-CEACAM5 antibody-drug conjugate with the topoisomerase 1 inhibitor exatecan as payload. Precem-TcT demonstrated strong antitumor activity and potent bystander activity in preclinical models. Its toxicity profile in cynomolgus monkeys was consistent with that of exatecan. In the dose-escalation stage of the phase 1 trial of Precem-TcT (PROCEADE-CRC-01), 40 heavily pretreated patients with irinotecan-refractory metastatic CRC received Precem-TcT every 3 weeks across seven dose levels (DLs, 0.6-3.2 mg kg-1). Primary endpoints were dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), adverse events and preliminary clinical activity to establish the recommended dose(s) for expansion (RDEs). Secondary endpoints included pharmacokinetic parameters, objective response and median progression-free survival (mPFS). At the planned, end-of-dose-escalation analysis with extended follow-up (cutoff: 1 August 2024), seven patients had experienced DLTs, primarily hematologic events at 3.0 mg kg-1 and 3.2 mg kg-1. A treatment-related death, also deemed disease related, was reported in a patient with multiple comorbidities and grade 3 obesity. The maximum tolerated dose was determined to be 2.8 mg kg-1 every 3 weeks. Total and conjugated antibody pharmacokinetic profiles largely overlapped, indicating stability of the linker-payload (β-glucuronide-exatecan) in circulation. After a median treatment of 19.1 weeks (range: 1.7-48.3), three of 40 patients (7.5%) had confirmed partial responses (15.0% (6/40) unconfirmed), all at DLs ≥2.4 mg kg-1. mPFS was 5.9 months (95% confidence interval: 4.6-7.2); at DLs ≥2.4 mg kg-1 (n = 34), mPFS was 6.7 months (95% confidence interval: 4.6-8.8). Four patients (10.0%) remained on treatment at cutoff. These early clinical data corroborate preclinical findings, showing predictable safety and encouraging antitumor activity of Precem-TcT at DLs ≥2.4 mg kg-1, with no interstitial lung disease or ocular toxicity. The dose-optimization part at the RDEs of 2.4 mg kg-1 and 2.8 mg kg-1 (both every 3 weeks) in PROCEADE-CRC-01 is ongoing. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT05464030 .

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: S.K.: ownership interest in Lutris, Iylon, Frontier Medicines, Xilis and Navire; consultant for Genentech, the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, Holy Stone Healthcare, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca/MedImmune, Bayer Health, Redx Pharma, Ipsen, HalioDx, Lutris, Jacobio, Pfizer, Repare Therapeutics, Inivata, GlaxoSmithKline, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Iylon, Xilis, AbbVie, Amal Therapeutics, Gilead Sciences, Mirati Therapeutics, Flame Biosciences, Servier, Carina Biotech, Bicara Therapeutics, Endeavor BioMedicines, Numab, Johnson & Johnson/Janssen, Genomic Health, Frontier Medicines, Replimune, Taiho Pharmaceutical, Cardiff Oncology, Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb-Medarex, Amgen, Tempus, Foundation Medicine, Harbinger Oncology, Takeda, CureTeq, Zentalis, Black Stone Therapeutics, NeoGenomics Laboratories, Accademia Nazionale Di Medicina and Tachyon Therapeutics; and research funding from Sanofi, Biocartis, Guardant Health, Array BioPharma, Genentech/Roche, the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, MedImmune, Novartis, Amgen, Eli Lilly and Daiichi Sankyo. V.B.: institutional research funding from Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Loxo, Novartis, CytomX Therapeutics, Puma Biotechnology, Kura, Tesaro, Roche/Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Menarini, Synthon, Janssen Oncology, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, Eli Lilly, Merus, Pfizer, Bayer, Incyte, AbbVie, Zenith Epigenetics, Genmab, AstraZeneca, Adaptimmune, Alkermes, Amgen, Array BioPharma, Boehringer Ingelheim, BioNTech AG and Boston Biomedical; consulting fees from OncoArt and Guidepoint Global; honoraria fees from Loxo, Ideaya Biosciences, Puma Biotechnology, Amunix, Guidepoint Global and the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany; speakers’ bureau fees from Solti, Eli Lilly and Tactics; advisory board attendance or travel fees from START and Bayer; leadership at NEXT Oncology (to the institution); and stock ownership. K.K.: research funding (to the institution) from Ono Pharmaceutical for this clinical trial; consulting fees from Ono Pharmaceutical, Bristol Myers Squibb, BeiGene/Novartis, AstraZeneca, Roche, Bayer, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany and Janssen; honoraria from Ono Pharmaceutical and Bristol Myers Squibb; and payments for expert testimony from Ono Pharmaceutical and Bristol Myers Squibb. K.P.S.R.: honoraria from Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca, Eisai, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ and Seagen; consulting or advisory role for Bayer, Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca, Eisai, Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ and Seagen; research funding from AbbVie (to the institution), Bayer (to the institution), Daiichi Sankyo/AstraZeneca (to the institution), Eisai (to the institution), Guardant Health (to the institution), HiberCell (to the institution), Innovent Biologics (to the institution), Janssen (to the institution), the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany (to the institution), Roche/Genentech (to the institution), UCB (to the institution) and Xencor (to the institution). I.-R.R. declares personal, advisory board, for Syneos and Telix Pharmaceuticals and financial interests, institutional, employment with NEXT Oncology. A.P., C.B., A.S., P.C., W.S., S.R.-W. and F.H. are employees of the healthcare business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1. Preclinical data overview.
a, Selective killing of CEACAM5-positive cancer cell lines compared to CEACAM5-negative cell line. Data are mean ± s.d. (n = 3) from a representative replicate of three independent experiments. b, Bystander effect of Precem-TcT and tusa.rav.a. in in vitro co-culture experiments (1 nM ADC). Data are mean from a representative replicate of two independent experiments. c, In vivo efficacy of Precem-TcT in comparison to tusa.rav.a. in two CRC PDX models: REPF210 and COPF230; data are mean ± s.e.m. from n = 6 mice per treatment group and n = 5 mice per treatment group, respectively. d, Potency shift assay using Precem-TcT in comparison to tusa.rav.a. or different payloads with and without Pgp inhibition using verapamil/zosuquidar (LS513 cell line). Left panel: data are mean ± s.e.m. (n = 2) from a representative replicate of two independent experiments; right panel: each data point represents an independent experiment and is the mean of two technical replicates; horizontal black line represents the mean of the two data points. e, Potency shift assay using payloads with and without BCRP inhibition in OUMS23 cell line (left) and SNU5 cell line (right). Each data point represents an independent experiment and is the mean of two technical replicates. Horizontal black line represents the mean of the two data points. f, Antitumor efficacy of Precem-TcT compared to that of irinotecan in the human CRC PDX model CXF4102, derived from a patient with CRC previously treated with irinotecan-based SoC (FOLFIRI/Avastin). Data are mean ± s.e.m. from n = 6 mice per treatment group. w/o, without. Source data
Fig. 2
Fig. 2. Patient disposition.
CONSORT diagram for the PROCEADE-CRC-01 dose escalation study.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3. Efficacy overview.
a, Best overall response (confirmed). The waterfall plot only includes patients who have a post-baseline assessment (n = 36). Most of the patients had high CEACAM5 expression, as indicated by the dark blue boxes in the ‘Percentage of CEACAM5-positive tumors’ category. Blank boxes indicate that CEACAM5 expression data were not available. b, Progression-free survival. c, Treatment duration and response over time. CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; N, no; NE, not evaluable; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; U, unknown; Y, yes.
Extended Data Fig. 1
Extended Data Fig. 1. Bystander effect of Precem-TcT and tusa.rav.a.
In vitro co-culture experiments (1 nM ADC) with lower number of CEACAM5-positive cells and a control of CEACAM5-negative cells only. Data are mean (n = 2) from a representative replicate of 2 independent experiments.
Extended Data Fig. 2
Extended Data Fig. 2. Study design of PROCEADE-CRC-01.
3L, third line; 3 L + , third- or later-line; ADA, anti-drug antibody; AE, adverse event; CRC, colorectal cancer; DC, disease control; DL, dose level; DLT, dose-limiting toxicity; DoR, duration of response; ECG, electrocardiogram; ECOG PS, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; Est. estimated; FiH, first-in-human; ICI, immune checkpoint inhibitor; IV, intravenous; la/m, locally advanced/metastatic; MSI-H, microsatellite instability high; MTD, maximum tolerable dose; OR, objective response; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; PK, pharmacokinetics; Q2W, every 2 weeks; Q3W, every 3 weeks; RDE, recommended dose for expansion; RECIST v1.1, Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors version 1.1; TTR, time to response; US, United States. aAssessed by investigator per RECIST v1.1. 1. Kopetz S, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2024;42(16_Suppl):3000.
Extended Data Fig. 3
Extended Data Fig. 3. Clinical pharmacokinetics of Precem-TcT.
Panel a. Solid line represents the predicted value, dotted lines show 95% CI. Panel b. Error bars show 95% CIs (assessed as the 2.5th and 97.5th quantiles by nominal time points). AUC, area under curve; CI, confidence interval.

References

    1. World Health Organization. Colorectal cancer. https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/colorectal-cancer#:~:te... (2023).
    1. WCRF International. Colorectal Cancer Statistics. https://www.wcrf.org/cancer-trends/colorectal-cancer-statistics/#:~:text...
    1. National Cancer Institute Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results Program. Cancer Stat Facts: Colorectal Cancer. https://seer.cancer.gov/statfacts/html/colorect.html
    1. Kahi, C. J. et al. Colonoscopy surveillance after colorectal cancer resection: recommendations of the US Multi-Society Task Force on colorectal cancer. Am. J. Gastroenterol.111, 337–346 (2016). - PubMed
    1. Biller, L. H. & Schrag, D. Diagnosis and treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer: a review. JAMA325, 669–685 (2021). - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data