Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 27;17(7):106311.
doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106311.

Application of a glasses-free 3D laparoscopic system in radical gastrointestinal cancer surgery

Affiliations

Application of a glasses-free 3D laparoscopic system in radical gastrointestinal cancer surgery

Rong-Wei Shen et al. World J Gastrointest Surg. .

Abstract

Background: The clinical application of autostereoscopic (glass-free) 3D laparoscopic systems in the radical resection of gastrointestinal malignancies remains to be fully evaluated.

Aim: To compare the surgical outcomes and short-term postoperative complications between autostereoscopic (glass-free) 3D and glasses-based 3D laparoscopic systems in patients undergoing radical resection for gastric and colorectal malignancies.

Methods: This retrospective study involved 165 patients (99 males, 66 females; median age: 63 years; range: 28-86 years) who underwent laparoscopic radical resection for gastrointestinal malignancies between October 2022 and May 2023. Patients were divided into naked-eye 3D groups (gastric cancer: n = 16; colorectal cancer: n = 19) and glasses-based 3D groups (gastric cancer: n = 52; colorectal cancer: n = 78). Surgical outcomes and 30-day postoperative complications were compared between the groups.

Results: For gastric cancer patients, no significant differences in operation time [195 (169, 214) minutes vs 196 (173, 222) minutes], blood loss [20 (10, 90) mL vs 40 (20, 100) mL], or complication rates (12.5% vs 17.3%) were detected between the naked-eye 3D (n = 16) and glasses-based (n = 52) groups. Similarly, in colorectal cancer patients, comparable outcomes were achieved between groups, with postoperative complication rates of 15.8% and 14.1%, respectively. No conversion to open surgery was required in either group.

Conclusion: Preliminary evidence suggests that the autostereoscopic 3D laparoscopic system achieves comparable surgical outcomes to those of conventional glasses-based systems in the radical resection of gastrointestinal malignancies. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate these findings.

Keywords: Autostereoscopic 3D technology; Gastrointestinal cancer; Gastrointestinal neoplasms; Laparoscopic surgery; Surgical outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.

Similar articles

References

    1. Bhattacharjee HK, K DJ, Patel DK, Chaliyadan S, Khan WF, Pandey S, Joshi M, Suhani S, Parshad R. Impact of 3D Endovision System on Learning Process of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair of Groin Hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2025;35:216–223. - PubMed
    1. Du C, Li J, Zhang B, Feng W, Zhang T, Li D. Intraoperative navigation system with a multi-modality fusion of 3D virtual model and laparoscopic real-time images in laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: a preclinical study. BMC Surg. 2022;22:139. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Portale G, Bartolotta P, Azzolina D, Gregori D, Fiscon V. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with 2D or 3D video system technology: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023;38:34. - PubMed
    1. Kraljevic M, Süsstrunk J, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, Bueter M, Gero D, Schultes B, Poljo A, Schneider R, Peterli R. Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Obesity: The SM-BOSS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2025;160:369–377. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mondaini N, Abramo A, Romeo C, Crocerossa F, Cantiello F, Damiano R, Bartoletti R. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the simultaneous implant of a penile prosthesis: ten years follow up. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025;97:13541. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources