Application of a glasses-free 3D laparoscopic system in radical gastrointestinal cancer surgery
- PMID: 40740918
- PMCID: PMC12305265
- DOI: 10.4240/wjgs.v17.i7.106311
Application of a glasses-free 3D laparoscopic system in radical gastrointestinal cancer surgery
Abstract
Background: The clinical application of autostereoscopic (glass-free) 3D laparoscopic systems in the radical resection of gastrointestinal malignancies remains to be fully evaluated.
Aim: To compare the surgical outcomes and short-term postoperative complications between autostereoscopic (glass-free) 3D and glasses-based 3D laparoscopic systems in patients undergoing radical resection for gastric and colorectal malignancies.
Methods: This retrospective study involved 165 patients (99 males, 66 females; median age: 63 years; range: 28-86 years) who underwent laparoscopic radical resection for gastrointestinal malignancies between October 2022 and May 2023. Patients were divided into naked-eye 3D groups (gastric cancer: n = 16; colorectal cancer: n = 19) and glasses-based 3D groups (gastric cancer: n = 52; colorectal cancer: n = 78). Surgical outcomes and 30-day postoperative complications were compared between the groups.
Results: For gastric cancer patients, no significant differences in operation time [195 (169, 214) minutes vs 196 (173, 222) minutes], blood loss [20 (10, 90) mL vs 40 (20, 100) mL], or complication rates (12.5% vs 17.3%) were detected between the naked-eye 3D (n = 16) and glasses-based (n = 52) groups. Similarly, in colorectal cancer patients, comparable outcomes were achieved between groups, with postoperative complication rates of 15.8% and 14.1%, respectively. No conversion to open surgery was required in either group.
Conclusion: Preliminary evidence suggests that the autostereoscopic 3D laparoscopic system achieves comparable surgical outcomes to those of conventional glasses-based systems in the radical resection of gastrointestinal malignancies. Further large-scale studies are needed to validate these findings.
Keywords: Autostereoscopic 3D technology; Gastrointestinal cancer; Gastrointestinal neoplasms; Laparoscopic surgery; Surgical outcomes.
©The Author(s) 2025. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article.
Similar articles
-
Clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of laparoscopic surgery for colorectal cancer: systematic reviews and economic evaluation.Health Technol Assess. 2006 Nov;10(45):1-141, iii-iv. doi: 10.3310/hta10450. Health Technol Assess. 2006. PMID: 17083853
-
Does Augmenting Irradiated Autografts With Free Vascularized Fibula Graft in Patients With Bone Loss From a Malignant Tumor Achieve Union, Function, and Complication Rate Comparably to Patients Without Bone Loss and Augmentation When Reconstructing Intercalary Resections in the Lower Extremity?Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 26. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003599. Online ahead of print. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 40569278
-
Are There Sex Differences in the Association of Alcohol Consumption With the Risk of Soft Tissue Sarcoma? A Nationwide Population-based Study in Korea.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jun 25. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003602. Online ahead of print. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025. PMID: 40658922
-
Laparoscopic versus open resection for sigmoid diverticulitis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Nov 25;11(11):CD009277. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009277.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 29178125 Free PMC article.
-
Surgery for weight loss in adults.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Aug 8;2014(8):CD003641. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003641.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. PMID: 25105982 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bhattacharjee HK, K DJ, Patel DK, Chaliyadan S, Khan WF, Pandey S, Joshi M, Suhani S, Parshad R. Impact of 3D Endovision System on Learning Process of Laparoscopic Transabdominal Preperitoneal Repair of Groin Hernia. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2025;35:216–223. - PubMed
-
- Portale G, Bartolotta P, Azzolina D, Gregori D, Fiscon V. Laparoscopic right hemicolectomy with 2D or 3D video system technology: systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023;38:34. - PubMed
-
- Kraljevic M, Süsstrunk J, Wölnerhanssen BK, Peters T, Bueter M, Gero D, Schultes B, Poljo A, Schneider R, Peterli R. Long-Term Outcomes of Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass vs Laparoscopic Sleeve Gastrectomy for Obesity: The SM-BOSS Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Surg. 2025;160:369–377. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Mondaini N, Abramo A, Romeo C, Crocerossa F, Cantiello F, Damiano R, Bartoletti R. Laparoscopic radical prostatectomy with the simultaneous implant of a penile prosthesis: ten years follow up. Arch Ital Urol Androl. 2025;97:13541. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources