Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2025 Sep 3;69(9):e0005225.
doi: 10.1128/aac.00052-25. Epub 2025 Jul 31.

Pharmacokinetics of first-line tuberculosis drugs rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide during pregnancy and postpartum with and without efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment: IMPAACT P1026s study

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Pharmacokinetics of first-line tuberculosis drugs rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide during pregnancy and postpartum with and without efavirenz-based antiretroviral treatment: IMPAACT P1026s study

Marije Van Schalkwyk et al. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. .

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics (PK) of antituberculosis drugs may be altered by both pregnancy-induced physiological changes and drug interactions in individuals living with HIV who develop tuberculosis. Within the multicenter International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Network P1026s study, we assessed the PK of rifampin, isoniazid, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide during pregnancy and postpartum (PP) in women on efavirenz-based antiretroviral therapy (ART). Results were compared to a previously published non-HIV group and described minimum targets. World Health Organization-recommended daily doses of antituberculosis and ART medications were administered, followed by PK sampling of all antituberculosis drugs over 24 h during the second trimester (2T), third trimester (3T), and 2-8 weeks PP. PK parameters were characterized using noncompartmental analysis, and comparisons were made among stages of pregnancy and between groups using geometric mean ratios with 90% confidence intervals. Twenty-two participants were enrolled, and PK data were available for 12, 20, and 13 participants in 2T, 3T, and PP, respectively. While no significant difference in rifampin exposure between pregnancy and postpartum was detected, the median area-under-the-plasma-concentration-time-curve up to 24 h post-dose (AUC0-24) and Cmax were below target during each period and were 42% and 35% lower in 3T than the non-HIV group. No significant difference in isoniazid exposure was found between pregnancy and PP or between the groups. Ethambutol and pyrazinamide AUC0-24 and Cmax in 2T and 3T were similar between the groups. In both groups, pyrazinamide Cmax was above target in all periods. The clinical relevance of lower rifampin exposure in pregnant women requiring tuberculosis treatment while on efavirenz should be determined.

Keywords: antiretroviral therapy; drug-susceptible tuberculosis; efavirenz; ethambutol; isoniazid; pharmacokinetics; pregnancy; pyrazinamide; rifampin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1
Median plasma concentration-time profiles of (A) RIF, (B) INH, (C) EMB, and (D) PZA during 2T, 3T, and PP (error bars indicate the interquartile range [IQR]). The minimum target Cmax of each drug is represented by the horizontal dashed lines.
Fig 2
Fig 2
Box and whisker plots comparing plasma AUC0–24 of (A) RIF, (B) INH, (C) EMB, and (D) PZA and Cmax of (E) RIF, (F) INH, (G) EMB, and (H) PZA, respectively, during 2T, 3T, and PP (median, IQR, and range). The minimum targets are represented by the horizontal dashed lines.
Fig 3
Fig 3
Box and whisker plots showing plasma INH (A) AUC0–24 and (B) Cmax for the total group and per metabolizer type during the 2T and 3T and PP (median, IQR, and range). The minimum target AUC0–24 and Cmax are represented by the dashed lines.

References

    1. World Health Organization . 2024. Global tuberculosis report 2024. Available from: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789240101531. Accessed 31 Mar 2025.
    1. Mathad JS, Yadav S, Vaidyanathan A, Gupta A, LaCourse SM. 2022. Tuberculosis infection in pregnant people: current practices and research priorities. Pathogens 11:1481. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11121481 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoffmann CJ, Variava E, Rakgokong M, Masonoke K, van der Watt M, Chaisson RE, Martinson NA. 2013. High prevalence of pulmonary tuberculosis but low sensitivity of symptom screening among HIV-infected pregnant women in South Africa. PLoS ONE 8:e62211. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0062211 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sobhy S, Babiker ZOE, Zamora J, Khan KS, Kunst H. 2017. Maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity associated with tuberculosis during pregnancy and the postpartum period: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. BJOG 124:727–733. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14408 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Snow KJ, Bekker A, Huang GK, Graham SM. 2020. Tuberculosis in pregnant women and neonates: a meta-review of current evidence. Paediatr Respir Rev 36:27–32. doi: 10.1016/j.prrv.2020.02.001 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources