Beyond the Grant-Stebbins model: floral adaptive landscapes and plant speciation
- PMID: 40742017
- DOI: 10.1093/aob/mcaf096
Beyond the Grant-Stebbins model: floral adaptive landscapes and plant speciation
Abstract
Background: Floral diversity, a striking feature of angiosperm evolution, provides the impetus and rationale for linking pollinator-driven selection to speciation processes. Perhaps the most widely adopted model for pollinator-driven speciation is the Grant-Stebbins model, in which plant populations locally adapt to the most effective pollinator, leading to floral ecotype formation and, eventually, reproductive isolation and speciation. However, modelling and empirical studies suggest that populations need not adapt to the most effective pollinator, and major floral transitions remain poorly explained.
Scope: We evaluate the Grant-Stebbins model, focusing especially on the most effective pollinator principle. We use floral adaptive landscapes to articulate a more complete and accurate framework for understanding floral adaptation, starting with the premise that plants evolve to maximize fitness. We highlight ways to improve the assessment of pollinator fitness functions, both singly and in combination. We show how floral adaptive landscapes can be used to describe processes of floral adaptation within populations, evolutionary transitions between floral phenotypes, and a variety of real-world situations that do not fit neatly under the Grant-Stebbins model. Finally, we evaluate how floral adaptive landscapes can clarify the role of pollination in speciation under a variety of species concepts.
Conclusions: The Grant-Stebbins model, while inspiring decades of empirical studies, is a caricature of pollinator-driven speciation and explains only a limited range of adaptive outcomes. By using adaptive landscapes, we acknowledge that flowers are not adaptations to the most effective pollinator, but adaptations to maximize fitness, making evolutionary shifts between distinct floral phenotypes easier to understand in multi-pollinator environments. Finally, we argue that while pollinators often drive floral divergence, speciation most likely results from simultaneous divergence in multiple niche axes across a geographic range, which has been underemphasized in plant speciation research.
Keywords: Angiosperms; Grant–Stebbins model; floral adaptive landscapes; flowers; most effective pollinator principle; natural selection; plant speciation; pollination.
© The Author(s) 2025. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Annals of Botany Company.
Similar articles
-
Multifunctionality of angiosperm floral bracts: a review.Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024 Jun;99(3):1100-1120. doi: 10.1111/brv.13060. Epub 2024 Jan 30. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2024. PMID: 38291834 Review.
-
Landscape homogenization strengthens the fitness benefits of plant species' centrality in pollination networks.Ecol Appl. 2025 Jul;35(5):e70069. doi: 10.1002/eap.70069. Ecol Appl. 2025. PMID: 40605554 Free PMC article.
-
Geographical variation in flower colour of a food-deceptive orchid reflects local pollinator preferences.Ann Bot. 2025 Apr 17:mcaf074. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcaf074. Online ahead of print. Ann Bot. 2025. PMID: 40244648
-
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59. Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024. PMID: 38993656 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Pollinator-mediated selection on Krameria oil flowers: a flower-pollinator fit adaptation to an atypical oil-collecting behaviour?Ann Bot. 2024 Oct 30;134(4):603-614. doi: 10.1093/aob/mcae102. Ann Bot. 2024. PMID: 38916514 Free PMC article.
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources