International expert panel's potentially inappropriate prescribing cascades (PIPC) list
- PMID: 40742670
- PMCID: PMC12712104
- DOI: 10.1007/s41999-025-01215-x
International expert panel's potentially inappropriate prescribing cascades (PIPC) list
Erratum in
-
Correction: International expert panel's potentially inappropriate prescribing cascades (PIPC) list.Eur Geriatr Med. 2026 Feb;17(1):409-410. doi: 10.1007/s41999-025-01378-7. Eur Geriatr Med. 2026. PMID: 41410825 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
Purpose: Prescribing cascades contribute to potentially inappropriate prescribing, especially among older adults. With the prescribing cascade framework maturation, it is important to distinguish potentially inappropriate from potentially appropriate prescribing cascades. The objective was to create a comprehensive consensus list of Potentially Inappropriate Prescribing Cascades (PIPCs).
Methods: A prescribing cascade inventory was compiled using published lists. An international panel of 12 experts in geriatric medicine and pharmacology was selected. Panelists participated in a Delphi consensus process completing two questionnaire rounds and one discussion round.
Results: A total of 107 proposed prescribing cascades were identified. After Questionnaire Round 1, 56 prescribing cascades achieved a rating of agree or strongly agree by ≥ 75% of the panelists and were included in the PIPC list. For 32 of the 107 proposed cascades, 50-74% of panelists provided a rating of agree or strongly agree, and were moved to Round 2. In Questionnaire Round 2, 9 of 32 proposed cascades achieved a rating of agree or strongly agree by ≥ 75% of panelists and were included in the final PIPC list. For 14 prescribing cascades, 50-74% of panelists provided a rating of agree or strongly agree, and were included in the Discussion Round. After discussion, no additional prescribing cascades were included.
Conclusion: An explicit list of 65 PIPCs was created using a rigorous Delphi consensus process conducted by international experts on pharmacotherapy for older adults. The PIPC list provides a crucial tool for clinicians and researchers to detect potentially inappropriate prescribing patterns and to foster efforts to improve medication safety.
Keywords: Delphi consensus; Older adults; Optimizing drug therapy; Prescribing cascade.
© 2025. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to European Geriatric Medicine Society.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors have no competing interest that are directly or indirectly relevant to the content of this study. Ethical approval: The study was approved by the Research Ethics Board of Women’s College Hospital (REB #: 2024-0011-E). Informed consent: The protocol was registered in Open Science Framework ( https://doi.org/10.17605/OSF.IO/7DF62 ).
Figures
References
-
- World Health Organization (2017) Medication Without Harm - Global Patient Safety Challenge on Medication Safety. 2017. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Accessed May 26 2020. . https://www.who.int/patientsafety/medication-safety/medication-without-h...
-
- Duerden M, Avery T, Payne R (2013) Polypharmacy and medicines optimization—Making it safe and sound. The King's Fund (https://assets.kingsfund.org.uk/f/256914/x/0ffd18f8d6/polypharmacy_medic...), accessed on 9 Jan 2025).
-
- Rochon PA, Gurwitz JH (1997) Optimising drug treatment for elderly people: the prescribing cascade. Rev BMJ (Clin Res ed) 315(7115):1096–1099 - DOI
-
- Deprescribing Guidelines and Algorithms - Deprescribing.org. Deprescribing.org. Accessed 21 Nov 2024. https://deprescribing.org/resources/deprescribing-guidelines-algorithms/
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
