Chronic endometritis, chronic questions: a narrative review of current practices
- PMID: 40742978
- DOI: 10.1097/GCO.0000000000001053
Chronic endometritis, chronic questions: a narrative review of current practices
Abstract
Purpose of review: Chronic endometritis is a condition that may affect reproductive outcomes, particularly in patients with unexplained infertility, recurrent implantation failure, or recurrent pregnancy loss. This review concisely summarizes the available literature, highlighting some of the controversies on this topic.
Recent findings: Although embryo selection through preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy has improved, many euploid embryo transfers still fail, prompting interest in endometrial factors such as chronic endometritis. Chronic endometritis is typically asymptomatic and diagnosed by identifying plasma cells in endometrial biopsy specimens; however, diagnostic criteria vary widely regarding biopsy timing, staining techniques, and threshold definitions, contributing to inconsistent prevalence and outcomes across studies. It is often attributed to chronic infection and is treated with empirical or culture-guided antibiotics, though reported cure rates vary significantly. While some studies suggest that treating chronic endometritis improves reproductive outcomes, evidence is limited by methodological heterogeneity. Meta-analyses support treatment, yet diagnostic inconsistencies and potential effects of antibiotics on the microbiome remain concerns.
Summary: While frequently diagnosed in the infertility setting, the true prevalence and impact of chronic endometritis remain unclear. The heterogeneity of the existing literature and the lack of large prospective cohort studies remain challenges to fully understanding the condition, particularly regarding the general infertile population.
Keywords: chronic endometritis; plasma cells; recurrent implantation failure; recurrent pregnancy loss.
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
References
-
- Tiegs AW, Tao X, Zhan Y, et al. A multicenter, prospective, blinded, nonselection study evaluating the predictive value of an aneuploid diagnosis using a targeted next-generation sequencing-based preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy assay and impact of biopsy. Fertil Steril. 2020; 115:627–637.
-
- Pirtea P, De Ziegler D, Tao X, et al. Rate of true recurrent implantation failure is low: results of three successive frozen euploid single embryo transfers. Fertil Steril. 2021; 115:45–53.
-
- Gill P, Ata B, Arnanz A, et al. Does recurrent implantation failure exist? Prevalence and outcomes of five consecutive euploid blastocyst transfers in 123 987 patients. Hum Reprod. 2024; 39:974–980.
-
- Reig A, Franasiak J, Scott RT Jr, Seli E. The impact of age beyond ploidy: outcome data from 8175 euploid single embryo transfers. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2020; 37:595–602.
-
- Doyle N, Jahandideh S, Hill MJ, et al. Effect of timing by endometrial receptivity testing vs standard timing of frozen embryo transfer on live birth in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2022; 328:2117–2125.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
