Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 31;20(7):e0328896.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0328896. eCollection 2025.

Effect of tillage system on epigeal and foliar insect predation in an organic cropping system in Pennsylvania, USA

Affiliations

Effect of tillage system on epigeal and foliar insect predation in an organic cropping system in Pennsylvania, USA

Shea A W Tillotson et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Organic growers rely largely on cultural and biological control to manage pest populations and often use soil disturbance with inversion tillage to manage pests and weeds, incorporate crop residues and fertility amendments, and create seedbeds. Reduced-tillage systems are often associated with greater populations of insect generalist predators, as tillage can directly and indirectly disrupt predators and their activity. We investigated the in-season and legacy effects of soil disturbance in three organic feed grain and one forage production systems that varied in frequency and intensity of disturbance on epigeal predation rates on larval waxworms, Galleria mellonella L., and foliar predation rates on eggs of the western bean cutworm, Striacosta albicosta Smith, and European corn borer, Ostrinia nubilalis (Hübner), by arthropod natural enemies. The experimental site included three annual feed grain production systems comprised of a corn, Zea mays L., soybean, Glycine max (L.) Merr., and wheat Triticum aestivum L. sequence and one forage production system represented by a biculture of alfalfa, Medicago sativa L. and orchardgrass, Dactylis glomerata L. We also measured damage to corn ears from naturally occurring lepidopteran pests and corn yield. The epigeal predation rate on sentinel waxworms in the system managed predominantly with reduced tillage (64 ± 6.4%) was significantly greater than in the systems managed predominantly with inversion tillage (44 ± 5.5%) or with a shallow high-speed disk (48 ± 5.1%). There was no effect of intensity or frequency of soil disturbance on foliar predation or foliar predator community composition in corn. Damage to corn ears from lepidopteran pests was greater in the system managed predominantly with a shallow high-speed disk (51 ± 4.4% damaged ears) compared to systems predominantly managed with inversion tillage (35 ± 4.3%) or no-till planting (31 ± 1.4%). There was no difference in corn yield across systems, but corn yield variability was greatest in the reduced tillage system. We suggest that the occasional use of inversion tillage with a moldboard plow may not have lasting detrimental effects on foliar or epigeal predation rates on arthropod pests in annual organic grain production systems.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Percent of waxworm larvae predated in Systems 1 (inversion), 2 (HSD), and 3 (reduced tillage) in soybean in 2021, 2022, and 2023 (left panel).
Percent of waxworm larvae predated on assays conducted in June and September in 2021, 2022, and 2023 (right panel). HSD = High-speed disk.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Percent of waxworm larvae predated in corn in Systems 1 (inversion), 2 (HSD), and 3 (reduced tillage in soybean followed by inversion tillage in corn) (left) and by year and assay event (right).
HSD = High-speed disk.

References

    1. Part 205 – National Organic Program. National Archives Code of Federal Regulations. 2000. https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-7/subtitle-B/chapter-I/subchapter-M/p...
    1. Durham TC, Mizik T. Comparative economics of conventional, organic, and alternative agricultural production systems. Economies. 2021;9(2):64. doi: 10.3390/economies9020064 - DOI
    1. Birkhofer K, Bezemer TM, Bloem J, Bonkowski M, Christensen S, Dubois D, et al. Long-term organic farming fosters below and aboveground biota: Implications for soil quality, biological control and productivity. Soil Biology and Biochemistry. 2008;40(9):2297–308. doi: 10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.05.007 - DOI
    1. Headrick D. The future of organic insect pest management: be a better entomologist or pay for someone who is. Insects. 2021;12(2):140. doi: 10.3390/insects12020140 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kremen C, Iles A, Bacon C. Diversified farming systems: an agroecological, systems-based alternative to modern industrial agriculture. Ecol Soc. 2012;17:44. doi: 10.5751/es-05103-170444 - DOI

LinkOut - more resources