Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 31:11:e59683.
doi: 10.2196/59683.

Practical Approaches to Patient-Centered Care in Europe: Mixed Methods Study Developing a Conceptual Framework for Comprehensive Cancer Care Networks

Affiliations

Practical Approaches to Patient-Centered Care in Europe: Mixed Methods Study Developing a Conceptual Framework for Comprehensive Cancer Care Networks

Emily Hickmann et al. JMIR Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: In contemporary health care, patient-centered care has emerged as a pivotal paradigm shift that redefines the traditional physician-centric model. Particularly in the context of cancer care, marked by its intricate nature and emotional impact, there is a pressing requirement to rethink how health care is delivered. In this context, comprehensive cancer care networks (CCCNs) provide a new means of structuring and delivering quality cancer care, recognizing each patient's unique preferences and needs.

Objective: This study aimed to establish a consistent definition and framework for patient centeredness in CCCNs, facilitating the integration of a patient-centered approach to enhance care quality.

Methods: We conducted an umbrella review focusing on generic and oncology-specific dimensions of patient centeredness to establish the definition and framework. The data were analyzed and synthesized using an inductive category development approach, which guided the derivation of dimensions for the framework. The review was complemented by a survey of 23 key stakeholders within CCCNs and a focus group with patient representatives. This process involved iterative group discussions to achieve consensus on the framework and definition.

Results: The study presents a robust definition and framework of patient centeredness tailored to CCCNs, validated by an initial agreement rate of 96% among survey respondents. Patient centeredness in a CCCN is defined as a philosophy of care prioritizing the physical, emotional, and social needs and personal values of patients with cancer at every step of the patient pathway. In patient-centered CCCNs, patients are empowered and engaged in becoming active partners in health care in relation to their individual preferences and capabilities, with the goal of providing personalized, high-quality, holistic care with the best possible outcomes. The framework comprises 8 primary dimensions: empowering patients, engaging and involving patients, treating the patient as a unique person, enhancing the therapeutic relationship, enhancing a patient-centered culture, providing holistic care, recognizing and supporting the health care professional as a person, and coordinating care. Each dimension is supported by specific subdimensions and actionable patient-centered activities that facilitate practical implementation.

Conclusions: The results provide a comprehensive perspective on the complex elements that compose patient-centered care within CCCNs in Europe. This contributes to a better understanding and application of patient centeredness in cancer care and possibly other contexts. The results presented in this paper promise to support cancer care networks and other health care contexts in creating a patient-centered environment where patients feel genuinely heard, valued, and actively engaged in their care decisions.

Keywords: comprehensive cancer care networks; oncology; patient centeredness; patient empowerment; patient engagement.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Key elements defining a comprehensive cancer care network (image based on CanCon Guide).
Figure 2
Figure 2
PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) flow diagram of the literature selection process.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Inductive category formation approach based on the methodology by Mayring [39].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Framework of patient centeredness in comprehensive cancer care networks (CCCNs; icons created by Freepik, Kliwir art, and Samber The Labs from flaticon).
Figure 5
Figure 5
Subdimensions and examples of patient-centered activities in the dimension “empowering patients.”.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Subdimensions and examples of patient-centered activities in the “engaging and involving patients” dimension.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Subdimensions and examples of patient-centered activities in the “enhancing the therapeutic relationship” dimension.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Subdimensions and examples of patient-centered activities in the dimension “treating the patient as a unique person.”.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Subdimensions and examples of patient-centered activities in the dimension “providing holistic care.”.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Subdimensions and examples of patient-centered activities in the dimension “recognizing and supporting the health care provider as a person.”.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Subdimensions and examples of patient-centered activities in the dimension “coordinating care.”.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Subdimensions and examples of patient-centered activities in the dimension “enhancing a patient-centered culture.”.

References

    1. Bombard Y, Baker GR, Orlando E, Fancott C, Bhatia P, Casalino S, Onate K, Denis J, Pomey M. Engaging patients to improve quality of care: a systematic review. Implement Sci. 2018 Jul 26;13(1):98. doi: 10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z. https://implementationscience.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s13012-... 10.1186/s13012-018-0784-z - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hickmann E, Richter P, Schlieter H. All together now - patient engagement, patient empowerment, and associated terms in personal healthcare. BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Sep 02;22(1):1116. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08501-5. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-022-0... 10.1186/s12913-022-08501-5 - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. DeSantis M, Hervas C, Weinman A, Bottarelli V. Patient empowerment. National Centre for Rare Diseases. [2025-05-29]. http://www.rd-action.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/09/PATIENT-EMPOWERMENT.pdf .
    1. Kuipers SJ, Cramm JM, Nieboer AP. The importance of patient-centered care and co-creation of care for satisfaction with care and physical and social well-being of patients with multi-morbidity in the primary care setting. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Jan 08;19(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3818-y. https://bmchealthservres.biomedcentral.com/articles/10.1186/s12913-018-3... 10.1186/s12913-018-3818-y - DOI - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sparidaens EM, Logger JG, Nelen WL, Braat DD, Fleischer K, Hermens RP. Web-based guidance for assisted reproductive technology with an online app (myFertiCare): quantitative evaluation with the HOT-fit framework. J Med Internet Res. 2023 Jan 24;25:e38535. doi: 10.2196/38535. https://www.jmir.org/2023//e38535/ v25i1e38535 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources