Prevalence and Radiographic Patterns of Third Molar Impaction and Agenesis in the Kazakh Population
- PMID: 40743818
- PMCID: PMC12329515
- DOI: 10.1016/j.identj.2025.100897
Prevalence and Radiographic Patterns of Third Molar Impaction and Agenesis in the Kazakh Population
Abstract
Background: Third molars are the most commonly impacted teeth and frequently exhibit congenital absence (agenesis). Their eruption may be affected by jaw location, tooth angulation, and various demographic and genetic factors. There are no data on third molar status in the Kazakh population.
Purpose: This study aimed to determine the prevalence of third molar impaction and agenesis in the Kazakh population, investigate radiographic patterns (eg, angulation, location, root morphology), and assess associated pathologies such as alveolar bone loss and caries.
Study design, setting, sample: This retrospective study evaluated 2306 panoramic radiographs from a private clinic in Almaty, Kazakhstan, collected between December 2020 and July 2024. Participants were 15 to 30 years of age, with no history of third molar extractions or poor-quality radiographs. A total of 9224 third molar sites were evaluated.
Independent variable: Age, sex and jaw location (maxilla vs mandible) were considered primary factors potentially influencing third molar impaction and agenesis.
Main outcome variables: Key outcomes included the presence or absence of impacted and/or congenitally missing (agenesis) third molars, as well as radiographic characteristics (Winter's classification, Pell-Gregory levels, root morphology).
Covariates: Covariates encompassed eruption status (fully impacted, partially impacted, or erupted), tooth-specific location and associated pathologies.
Analyses: Chi-square tests were used to compare prevalence rates and distribution patterns by sex, age group and tooth location. Significance was set at P < .05.
Results: Impaction was detected in 68.0% of individuals aged 15 to 20. Agenesis occurred in 37.28%. Females had slightly higher rates of multiple impactions. Maxillary molars were predominantly completely impacted, whereas mandibular molars were mostly partially impacted. Alveolar bone loss (52.08%) and caries (36.9%) were the most frequent pathologies. Mesioangular impaction dominated in the mandible; distoangular positions prevailed in the maxilla.
Conclusions: The high prevalence of third molar impaction and agenesis underscores the importance of region-specific clinical guidelines. Early radiographic evaluation may aid in preventing complications and improving outcomes in this population.
Keywords: Agenesis; Impacted; Kazakhstan; Prevalence; Third molars.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Similar articles
-
Prevalence and Pattern of Tooth Impaction: A Radiographic Study in a Trinidadian Population.Niger J Clin Pract. 2024 Jul 1;27(7):837-843. doi: 10.4103/njcp.njcp_779_23. Epub 2024 Jul 27. Niger J Clin Pract. 2024. PMID: 39082908
-
Prevalence and Pattern of Impacted Mandibular Third Molar: An Institution-Based Retrospective Study.J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024 Dec;23(6):1485-1491. doi: 10.1007/s12663-024-02118-3. Epub 2024 Mar 14. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2024. PMID: 39618470
-
Age-related prevalence and correlation of dental and periodontal lesions in second molars adjacent to mesioangular and horizontally impacted mandibular third molars: a CBCT study.BMC Oral Health. 2025 Jul 2;25(1):1042. doi: 10.1186/s12903-025-06404-5. BMC Oral Health. 2025. PMID: 40604664 Free PMC article.
-
Surgical techniques for the removal of mandibular wisdom teeth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Jul 29;(7):CD004345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004345.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 26;7:CD004345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004345.pub3. PMID: 25069437 Updated.
-
Surgical removal versus retention for the management of asymptomatic disease-free impacted wisdom teeth.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 31;(8):CD003879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003879.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 May 4;5:CD003879. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003879.pub5. PMID: 27578151 Updated.
References
-
- International Classification of Diseases (ICD) [Accessed 18 February 2025]. Available from: https://www.who.int/standards/classifications/classification-of-diseases
-
- Shah R.M., Boyd M.A., Vakil TF. Studies of permanent tooth anomalies in 7,886 Canadian individuals. I: impacted teeth. Dent J. 1978;44(6):262–264. - PubMed
-
- Chu F., Li T., Lui V., Newsome P., Chow R., Cheung L. Prevalence of impacted teeth and associated pathologies – a radiographic study of the Hong Kong Chinese population. Hong Kong Med J. 2003;9(3) 158-3. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources