A numerical study of the relevance of the electrode-tissue contact area in the application of soft coagulation
- PMID: 40745470
- PMCID: PMC12314124
- DOI: 10.1038/s41598-025-13836-0
A numerical study of the relevance of the electrode-tissue contact area in the application of soft coagulation
Abstract
Monopolar electrocoagulation is a well-established surgical technique to achieve hemostasis by selectively destroying biological tissue through the application of high-frequency alternating current. However, this technique is associated with unwanted tissue damage. In this context, computational simulation is a valuable tool that can improve our understanding of such complex processes and highlight important application parameters in the direction of an improved control function to achieve safer and more reliable results. Despite its critical role in surgical applications, the influence of the electrode-tissue contact area has received little to no attention in previous simulation studies. To address this gap, the present study investigates the sensitivity of temperature distribution and necrotic volume formation to variations in electrode-tissue contact area. For this purpose, a multiphysics finite element model was developed to simulate HF current induced soft coagulation using a ball electrode under varying contact areas. Our findings demonstrate that variations in the contact area significantly impact temperature development and, consequently, necrosis formation. These results highlight the crucial role of the contact area in the electrocoagulation process and its associated necrosis formation. Furthermore, it was observed that when the boiling point of water is reached inside the tissue, complete necrosis has not yet formed at the contact site, which could lead to further undesired effects. Consequently, it is essential to consider the contact area in computational simulations and the development of novel control features for safer and more reliable electrocoagulation.
Keywords: Electrode-tissue contact surface; Finite element modeling; HF soft coagulation.
© 2025. The Author(s).
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.
Figures
References
-
- Ulmer, B. C. Electrosurgery: History and fundamentals. Perioperative Nursing Clinics2, 89–101. 10.1016/j.cpen.2007.03.003 (2007).
-
- Vällfors, B. & Erlandson, B.-E. Damage to nervous tissue from monopolar and bipolar electrocoagulation. Journal of Surgical Research29, 371–377. 10.1016/0022-4804(80)90071-2 (1980). - PubMed
-
- Chinpairoj, S., Feldman, M. D., Saunders, J. C. & Thaler, E. R. A comparison of monopolar electrosurgery to a new multipolar electrosurgical system in a rat model. The Laryngoscope111, 213–217. 10.1097/00005537-200102000-00005 (2001). - PubMed
-
- Morris, M. L. & Bowers, W. J. Math, myth and the fundamentals of electrosurgery. Journal of Hepatology and Gastroenterology1, 1–5, 10.14312/2399-8199.2016-1 (2016).
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
