Long-Term Effectiveness of a Stent-Less Strategy With Drug Coated Balloon in Coronary Artery Disease: 3-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective All-Comers Observational Study
- PMID: 40745698
- PMCID: PMC12313834
- DOI: 10.1002/clc.70189
Long-Term Effectiveness of a Stent-Less Strategy With Drug Coated Balloon in Coronary Artery Disease: 3-Year Follow-Up of a Prospective All-Comers Observational Study
Abstract
Introduction: Drug-eluting stent (DES) angioplasty is the gold standard treatment for coronary lesions. Drug-coated balloon (DCB) is an option for in-stent restenosis, and has also shown promise for small-calibre coronary artery disease. We evaluated the 3-year effectiveness of a decision algorithm for percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) that favoured a stent-less strategy (SLS) in primary angioplasty.
Methods: All patients who underwent angioplasty during 1 year were included in a prospective observational study. Patients eligible for SLS first underwent scoring balloon followed by DCB angioplasty or DES in case of mandatory bailout. Patients not eligible for SLS were unstable patients who underwent conventional drug-eluting stenting. The metal index, stent burden, was calculated by stent length divided by the total lesion length. A 36-month follow-up recorded target lesion revascularization (TLR).
Results: Patients eligible for SLS represented 85% (n = 840) of patients who underwent PCI. TLR was required in 2.6% and 6% of patients in the DCB-only and bailout-DES groups, respectively. Median metal index was 0.25 (IQR: 0.5) in patients with TLR. There was a difference between TLR-free survival distributions in the DCB-only and bailout-DES groups (p = 0.016).
Conclusions: The SLS based on a combination of scoring balloon and DCB was effective at 3 years with a low rate of TLR. This rate was higher in patients with stent burden.
Trial registration: This study was registered with clinicaltrials. gov (NCT03893396, first posted on March 28, 2019).
Keywords: DCB‐based strategy; angioplasty; coronary artery disease; drug‐coated balloon; drug‐eluting stent; patient outcome assessment; percutaneous coronary intervention.
© 2025 The Author(s). Clinical Cardiology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
Ludovic Meunier reports grants and personal honoraria payment from B Braun. Virginie Laurençon and Caroline Allix‐Béguec reports grants from B Braun. Matthias Waliszewski is an employee of B Braun. The other authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Windecker S., Kolh P., Alfonso F., et al., “2014 ESC/EACTS Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization: The Task Force on Myocardial Revascularization of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Association for Cardio‐Thoracic Surgery (EACTS)Developed With the Special Contribution of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI),” European Heart Journal 35, no. 37 (2014): 2541–2619. - PubMed
-
- Jeger R. V., Farah A., Ohlow M. A., et al., “Drug‐Coated Balloons for Small Coronary Artery Disease (BASKET‐SMALL 2): an Open‐Label Randomised Non‐Inferiority Trial,” Lancet 392, no. 10150 (2018): 849–856. - PubMed
-
- Zuin M. and Rigatelli G., “Treatment of De Novo Coronary Artery Bifurcation Lesions With Drug Coated Balloons: A Reappraisal According to the Available Scientific Data,” Cardiovascular Revascularization Medicine 19, no. 1 (2018): 57–64. - PubMed
-
- Rissanen T. T., Uskela S., and Siljander A., “Percutaneous Coronary Intervention of Complex Calcified Lesions With Drug‐Coated Balloon After Rotational Atherectomy,” Journal of Interventional Cardiology 30, no. 2 (2017): 139–146. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Associated data
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous
