Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 1985 Oct;20(4):387-91.
doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2125.1985.tb05082.x.

Comparison of two slow-release formulations of metoprolol with conventional metoprolol and atenolol in hypertensive patients

Clinical Trial

Comparison of two slow-release formulations of metoprolol with conventional metoprolol and atenolol in hypertensive patients

J H Silas et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol. 1985 Oct.

Abstract

We have compared the beta-adrenoceptor blocking and antihypertensive effects of chronic once daily treatment with conventional metoprolol 200 mg, two 'long-acting' formulations of metoprolol 200 mg and atenolol 100 mg in a cross-over study in 12 hypertensive patients concurrently receiving diuretic therapy. The peak effects of all compounds were similar, with significant reductions in exercise heart rate and blood pressure. Twenty-four hours after dosing only atenolol treatment was consistently associated with a reduction in both exercise heart rate (P less than 0.001) and blood pressure (P less than 0.02) when compared with placebo. Once daily treatment of hypertension with metoprolol, even in 'long-acting' formulations, cannot be recommended because of waning antihypertensive effect which would be missed at routine clinic attendance. Metoprolol should be prescribed twice daily in hypertension. So-called long-acting formulations do not always confer benefits over conventional dose forms.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Acta Pharmacol Toxicol (Copenh). 1975;36(Suppl 5):31-44 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1983 Sep 10;287(6394):717-20 - PubMed
    1. Lancet. 1977 Sep 17;2(8038):584-6 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1978 May 27;1(6124):1386-8 - PubMed
    1. Br Med J. 1978 Nov 4;2(6147):1269 - PubMed