Preclinical Vocal Fold and Airway Injury Models: A Scoping Review
- PMID: 40746632
- PMCID: PMC12311988
- DOI: 10.1002/lio2.70173
Preclinical Vocal Fold and Airway Injury Models: A Scoping Review
Abstract
Objectives: Preclinical models are necessary to study the pathophysiology of laryngotracheal diseases and novel treatments. Currently, there is no consensus on species, injury mechanics, and study duration This review provides a contemporary overview of the studies of vocal fold and laryngotracheal injuries in preclinical models.
Methods: A search was performed in PubMed and Web of Science involving various animal models undergoing vocal fold, trachea, and laryngotracheal injury and/or wound healing studies from 2013 to 2023. Articles were independently screened and selected by four reviewers.
Results: Of 1279 filtered studies, 197 studies were identified and categorized by species, study duration, and mechanism of injury (MOI): vocal fold stripping, intubation, lasers, microtools, scraping, and other MOIs. Within each MOI, studies were grouped by animal model, with subsections discussing tissue target, research aim, analysis method, and study duration. Leporine and rat models were the most employed animal models for both vocal fold wound healing and laryngotracheal models. Leporine studies had the broadest diversity in MOIs, with lasers, microtools, scraping, and other methods used. Comparatively, rat studies primarily utilized vocal fold stripping as a MOI, perhaps second to anatomic limitations. Larger species, specifically porcine models, were most prevalent in intubation injury studies. Ferret, mouse, and ovine models were less utilized. Study duration varied from 1 day to 3 months in vocal fold injury models and 30 min to 12 months in laryngotracheal injuries.
Conclusion: This review provides a foundational framework to collate and interpret available data on preclinical vocal fold and laryngotracheal injury models to guide future study design.
Level of evidence: Five scoping review/NA.
Keywords: laryngotracheal injury; pre‐clinical models; vocal fold injury; wound healing.
© 2025 The Author(s). Laryngoscope Investigative Otolaryngology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of The Triological Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflicts of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3. Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 39593159 Free PMC article.
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of debriding agents in treating surgical wounds healing by secondary intention.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(14):1-131. doi: 10.3310/hta5140. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11399237
-
A rapid and systematic review of the clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of topotecan for ovarian cancer.Health Technol Assess. 2001;5(28):1-110. doi: 10.3310/hta5280. Health Technol Assess. 2001. PMID: 11701100
-
Drugs for preventing postoperative nausea and vomiting in adults after general anaesthesia: a network meta-analysis.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Oct 19;10(10):CD012859. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012859.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020. PMID: 33075160 Free PMC article.
-
Dressings and topical agents for treating pressure ulcers.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jun 22;6(6):CD011947. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011947.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28639707 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Saran M., Georgakopoulos B., and Bordoni B., Anatomy, Head and Neck, Larynx Vocal Cords (StatPearls, 2023). - PubMed
-
- Suárez‐Quintanilla J., Fernández Cabrera A., and Sharma S., Anatomy, Head and Neck: Larynx (StatPearls, 2023). - PubMed
-
- Almanzar A. and Danckers M., Laryngotracheal Stenosis (StatPearls, 2023). - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials