Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jun 12;5(7):3032-3038.
doi: 10.1021/jacsau.5c00516. eCollection 2025 Jul 28.

Reductive Cleavage of Dioxygen Mediated by a Lewis Superacidic Bis(borane)

Affiliations

Reductive Cleavage of Dioxygen Mediated by a Lewis Superacidic Bis(borane)

Léon Escomel et al. JACS Au. .

Abstract

The bis-(borane) o-{(C6F5)2B}2C6F4 (1) reacts with dioxygen in the presence of decamethylferrocene (FeCp*2, Cp* = pentamethylcyclopentadienyl) to deliver the salt [(μ-OH)-o-{B-(C6F5)2}2C6F4]-[FeCp*2] (2) featuring a hydroxide sequestered by the two adjacent boron atoms. Mechanistic investigations of this formal 4-electron reduction of O2 suggest that it goes through the formation of a superoxide adduct [1-O2]-, which evolves through disproportionation into O2 and a peroxo-adduct [1-O2]2-. Upon coordination of another equivalent of 1, the thus-generated 4-fold boron-sequestered peroxide {[1]2-O2}2- undergoes homolytic O-O bond cleavage to yield a pair of oxyl radicals [1-O]-. These highly reactive intermediates subsequently perform hydrogen atom abstraction to lead to the hydroxide salt 2. Our observations point to FeCp*2 being the H atom purveyor in this final step.

Keywords: Lewis acids; boron; dioxygen; hydrogen atom abstraction; metallocenes; oxyl radical; peroxide; superoxide.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

1
1. Boron Lewis Acid Mediated O2 Reduction with Single Electron Donors (SED)
1
1
(A) Reactivity of 1 with O2 in the presence of FeCp*2 and control experiments showing absence of reactivity without FeCp*2 or O2. *O can be either 16O or 18O. (B) Solid-state structure of 2 with magnification of the five-membered ring (box). Ellipsoids are represented with 30% probability. For clarity, only one of the two molecules found in the asymmetric unit (Z’ = 2) is depicted, hydrogen atoms except H1 have been omitted, and the FeCp*2 + cation has been shaded in the background. (C) Experimental mass spectrum (black, ESI, negative mode) obtained after performing the reaction under 18O2, and simulated spectrum (red) of the ion [1–OH] following an 18O/16O isotopic distribution of 40/60. (D) Cyclic voltammograms (CH2Cl2, 1 M [N­(nBu)4]­BPh4), scanning toward cathodic potentials of 1 (blue), and an O2-saturated solution in the presence (black) and absence (green) of 1.
2
2. Reaction of 1 with MnCp*2 under N2
3
3. Reactions between 1 and Superoxide or Peroxide Sources
4
4. Proposed Mechanism to Explain the Formation of Hydroxide 2 from 1, O2 and FeCp*2

References

    1. Oberdorf K., Lichtenberg C.. Small Molecule Activation by Well-Defined Compounds of Heavy p-Block Elements. Chem. Commun. 2023;59(52):8043–8058. doi: 10.1039/D3CC02190D. - DOI - PubMed
    2. Weetman C.. Main Group Multiple Bonds for Bond Activations and Catalysis. Chem. – Eur. J. 2021;27(6):1941–1954. doi: 10.1002/chem.202002939. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    3. Kundu S.. Pincer-Type Ligand-Assisted Catalysis and Small-Molecule Activation by Non-VSEPR Main-Group Compounds. Chem. – Asian J. 2020;15(20):3209–3224. doi: 10.1002/asia.202000800. - DOI - PubMed
    4. Su Y., Kinjo R.. Small Molecule Activation by Boron-Containing Heterocycles. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019;48(13):3613–3659. doi: 10.1039/C9CS00072K. - DOI - PubMed
    5. Wilkins, L. C. ; Melen, R. L. . Small Molecule Activation with Frustrated Lewis Pairs. In Encyclopedia of Inorganic and Bioinorganic Chemistry; John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, 2017; pp 1–24. 10.1002/9781119951438.eibc2520. - DOI
    6. Yadav S., Saha S., Sen S. S.. Compounds with Low-Valent p-Block Elements for Small Molecule Activation and Catalysis. ChemCatChem. 2016;8(3):486–501. doi: 10.1002/cctc.201501015. - DOI
    1. Power P. P.. Main-Group Elements as Transition Metals. Nature. 2010;463(7278):171–177. doi: 10.1038/nature08634. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Slootweg, J. C. ; Jupp, A. R. . Frustrated Lewis Pairs; Springer Nature, 2020.
    2. Stephan D. W.. The Broadening Reach of Frustrated Lewis Pair Chemistry. Science. 2016;354(6317):aaf7229. doi: 10.1126/science.aaf7229. - DOI - PubMed
    3. Stephan D. W., Erker G.. Frustrated Lewis Pair Chemistry: Development and Perspectives. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2015;54(22):6400–6441. doi: 10.1002/anie.201409800. - DOI - PubMed
    4. Frustrated Lewis Pairs I: Uncovering and Understanding; Erker, G. , Stephan, D. W. , Eds.; Topics in Current Chemistry; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013.
    5. Frustrated Lewis Pairs II: Expanding the Scope; Erker, G. , Stephan, D. W. , Eds.; Topics in Current Chemistry; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2013.
    6. Stephan D. W., Erker G.. Frustrated Lewis Pairs: Metal-Free Hydrogen Activation and More. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2010;49(1):46–76. doi: 10.1002/anie.200903708. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu L. L., Stephan D. W.. Radicals Derived from Lewis Acid/Base Pairs. Chem. Soc. Rev. 2019;48(13):3454–3463. doi: 10.1039/C8CS00940F. - DOI - PubMed
    1. van der Zee L. J. C., Pahar S., Richards E., Melen R. L., Slootweg J. C.. Insights into Single-Electron-Transfer Processes in Frustrated Lewis Pair Chemistry and Related Donor–Acceptor Systems in Main Group Chemistry. Chem. Rev. 2023;123(15):9653–9675. doi: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.3c00217. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    2. Ju M., Lu Z., Novaes L. F. T., Martinez Alvarado J. I., Lin S.. Frustrated Radical Pairs in Organic Synthesis. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 2023;145(36):19478–19489. doi: 10.1021/jacs.3c07070. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    3. Dasgupta A., Richards E., Melen R. L.. Frustrated Radical Pairs: Insights from EPR Spectroscopy. Angew. Chem., Int. Ed. 2021;60(1):53–65. doi: 10.1002/anie.202010633. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources