Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 17:12:1597947.
doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2025.1597947. eCollection 2025.

Prognostic differences between persistent HFrEF and HFrecEF following acute myocardial infarction

Affiliations

Prognostic differences between persistent HFrEF and HFrecEF following acute myocardial infarction

Jeong Yoon Jang et al. Front Cardiovasc Med. .

Abstract

Background: Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) often leads to heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF), with some patients showing recovery of left ventricular ejection fraction (HFrecEF) over time. This study aimed to evaluate the prognostic differences between persistent HFrEF and HFrecEF.

Methods: This prospective cohort study included AMI patients with reduced LVEF (<40%) at admission. LVEF was reassessed one month later to classify patients into persistent HFrEF (LVEF <40%) or HFrecEF, defined as follow-up LVEF >40% with an absolute increase of ≥10% from baseline, in accordance with recent consensus definitions. Outcomes included cardiovascular mortality and/or rehospitalization for heart failure. Predictors of LVEF recovery were also analyzed.

Results: Of the 679 patients analyzed, 373 (55%) had persistent HFrEF, while 306 (45%) transitioned to HFrecEF. Patients with HFrecEF were younger, had fewer comorbidities, and were more likely to receive renin-angiotensin system (RAS) inhibitors and β-blockers.Cardiovascular mortality was significantly lower in the HFrecEF group (3.3% vs. 8.3%; adjusted HR 0.37, 95% CI: 0.18-0.77, p = 0.007), as was the rate of heart failure rehospitalization (6.2% vs. 10.2%; adjusted HR 0.60, 95% CI: 0.35-1.05, p = 0.074). Independent predictors of LVEF recovery included younger age, beta-blocker use, and RAS inhibitor use.

Conclusion: This study emphasizes the critical role of transitioning from persistent HFrEF to HFrecEF in improving clinical outcomes for AMI patients. Tailored management approaches, combined with routine echocardiographic monitoring and adherence to optimal medical therapy, are essential for optimizing patient care and long-term prognosis.

Keywords: AMI; HFREF; HFrecEF; predictors; prognosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Study flow diagram. AMI, acute myocardial infarction; HFrecEF, heart failure with recovered ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction; PCI, percutaneous coronary intervention.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Kaplan–Meier curves comparing adverse events between HFrecEF and persistent HFrEF groups. (A) All-cause death or heart failure readmission; (B) All-cause death; (C) Heart failure readmission. Solid lines represent the HFrecEF group; dashed lines represent the persistent HFrEF group. HFrecEF, heart failure with recovered ejection fraction; HFrEF, heart failure with reduced ejection fraction.

Similar articles

References

    1. Gerber Y, Weston SA, Berardi C, McNallan SM, Jiang R, Redfield MM, et al. Contemporary trends in heart failure with reduced and preserved ejection fraction after myocardial infarction: a community study. Am J Epidemiol. (2013) 178:1272–80. 10.1093/aje/kwt109 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim KA, Kim SH, Lee KY, Yoon AH, Hwang B, Choo EH, et al. Predictors and long-term clinical impact of heart failure with improved ejection fraction after acute myocardial infarction. J Am Heart Assoc. (2024) 13:e034920. 10.1161/JAHA.124.034920 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wilcox JE, Fang JC, Margulies KB, Mann DL. Heart failure with recovered left ventricular ejection fraction: JACC Scientific Expert Panel. J Am Coll Cardiol. (2020) 76:719–34. 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.05.075 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hammer Y, Yosef M, Khalatbari S, Aaronson KD. Heart failure with recovered ejection fraction in patients with nonischemic cardiomyopathy: characteristics, outcomes, and long-term follow-up. J Card Fail. (2023) 29:1593–602. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2023.06.022 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Coiro S, Girerd N, Rossignol P, Bauersachs J, Pitt B, Fay R, et al. Association of digitalis treatment with outcomes following myocardial infarction in patients with heart failure or evidence of left ventricular dysfunction: an analysis from the high-risk myocardial infarction database initiative. Clin Res Cardiol. (2017) 106:722–33. 10.1007/s00392-017-1116-z - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources