Surgical and Blood-Based Minimal Residual Disease in Patients with Ovarian Cancer after First-line Therapy: Clinical Outcomes and Translational Opportunities
- PMID: 40748258
- PMCID: PMC12485385
- DOI: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-25-0512
Surgical and Blood-Based Minimal Residual Disease in Patients with Ovarian Cancer after First-line Therapy: Clinical Outcomes and Translational Opportunities
Abstract
Purpose: Minimal residual disease (MRD) after first-line treatment of advanced-stage ovarian cancer remains a long-standing barrier to cure. We investigated the prognostic and translational value of MRD detection by second-look laparoscopy (SLL) and ctDNA at the completion of first-line therapy.
Experimental design: Patients with high-grade epithelial ovarian cancer who had a complete clinical response to first-line therapy and underwent SLL and plasma collection for ctDNA were included. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated based on MRD and clinicopathologic status. Spatial transcriptomics (GeoMx and Visium) and proteomics (CODEX) profiling were performed on serial samples from select patients.
Results: Forty of 95 (42.1%) patients had surgically detected MRD, which was associated with worse PFS (median PFS 7.4 vs. 23.8 months; P < 0.001) and OS (median OS 33.9 vs. not reached; P < 0.001). SLL positivity was an independent negative prognostic factor for OS (HR, 4.40; 95% confidence interval, 1.37-14.21; P = 0.013) in multivariable analysis. Among 44 patients who underwent SLL and had ctDNA testing, 34% (15/44) were ctDNA-positive, which was associated with worse PFS (6.4 vs. 28.1 months; P < 0.001) and OS (32.4 months vs. not reached; P = 0.008). We demonstrated the feasibility of spatial multiomics in studying MRD and their ability to provide hypothesis-generating observations, implicating the upregulation of the hypoxia signaling pathway, expression of multiple druggable targets (CDK6, GLS, MSLN, ERBB2), and immune exclusion in MRD lesions.
Conclusions: Approximately half of patients in clinical remission after first-line therapy have assessable MRD, which can inform prognosis, therapeutic target discovery, and clinical trials.
©2025 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.
Conflict of interest statement
Y. Yuan reports other support from Polaris Consulting LLC outside the submitted work. C.B. Scalise reports other support from Natera, Inc., outside the submitted work. P. Dutta reports other support from Natera, Inc. outside the submitted work. A.C. ElNaggar reports employment with Natera, Inc., and ownership or potential ownership of Natera, Inc., stock. M.C. Liu reports other support from Natera, Inc., outside the submitted work. S.N. Westin reports grants and personal fees from AstraZeneca, Bayer, Clovis Oncology/Pharm&, Daiichi Sankyo, GSK, Loxo, Mereo, Nuvectis, Pfizer, Roche/Genentech, Verastem, and Zentalis; grants from AvengeBio, Bio-Path, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, and Novartis; and personal fees from Caris, Corcept, Eisai, Gilead, Immunocore, ImmunoGen, Incyte, Lilly, Merck, Mersana, NGM Bio, SeaGen, and ZielBio outside the submitted work. A.K. Sood reports grants from the NCI, American Cancer Society, and Pfizer; personal fees from Iylon and from Onxeo; and other support from Advenchen and Mural Oncology outside the submitted work. C.L. Haymaker reports grants from the NIH during the conduct of the study as well as grants from Sanofi, Avenge, Iovance, KSQ Therapeutics, Theolytics, BTG, Novartis, 280Bio, AstraZeneca, EMD Serono, Takeda, Obsidian, Genentech, Bristol Myers Squibb, Summit Therapeutics, Artidis, and Immunogenesis; personal fees from Regeneron; and other support from Briacell outside the submitted work. L.M. Solis Soto reports other support from Theolytics and 10× Genomics and personal fees from BioNTech outside the submitted work. R. Grisham reports grants from Break Through Cancer during the conduct of the study as well as personal fees from AstraZeneca, Incyte, Physician Education Resources, MJH Health, Genmab, and Curio and nonfinancial support from Verastem outside the submitted work; in addition, R. Grisham has a patent for avutometinib and defactinib for mesonephric cancer pending. K.W. Wucherpfennig reports personal fees and other support from DEM BioPharma, Solu Therapeutics, D2M Biotherapeutics, DoriNano Inc., Immunitas Therapeutics, and TScan Therapeutics and personal fees from Nextechinvest outside the submitted work. L. Wang serves as a member of the Scientific Advisory Board for SELLAS Life Sciences and receives compensation outside the scope of this submitted work. A.A. Jazaeri reports nonfinancial support and other support from Natera and grants from Break Through Cancer during the conduct of the study as well as nonfinancial support from Personalis, Saga, and Imunon and other support from Merck outside the submitted work. No disclosures were reported by the other authors.
Figures
References
-
- Pantel K, Alix-Panabières C. Liquid biopsy and minimal residual disease—latest advances and implications for cure. Nat Rev Clin Oncol 2019;16:409–24. - PubMed
-
- Pitiyarachchi O, Friedlander M, Java JJ, Chan JK, Armstrong DK, Markman M, et al. What proportion of patients with stage 3 ovarian cancer are potentially cured following intraperitoneal chemotherapy? Analysis of the long term (≥10 years) survivors in NRG/GOG randomized clinical trials of intraperitoneal and intravenous chemotherapy in stage III ovarian cancer. Gynecol Oncol 2022;166:410–16. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Moore K, Colombo N, Scambia G, Kim BG, Oaknin A, Friedlander M, et al. Maintenance olaparib in patients with newly diagnosed advanced ovarian cancer. N Engl J Med 2018;379:2495–505. - PubMed
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
Miscellaneous
