Memantine for the Treatment of Primary Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
- PMID: 40748569
- DOI: 10.1007/s40261-025-01465-4
Memantine for the Treatment of Primary Negative Symptoms in Schizophrenia: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Abstract
Background: Memantine is an N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA) receptor antagonist with favorable safety and side effect profiles. There is a growing body of evidence for memantine as an adjunctive therapy for the positive, negative, and cognitive symptoms of schizophrenia.
Objective: This meta-analysis examined the efficacy of memantine as an add-on to treatment with antipsychotic(s) for the primary negative symptoms (PNS) of schizophrenia.
Methods: We followed Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines and searched for relevant publications in PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, Embase, and China Journal Net databases from inception using the following search terms: memantine, schizophrenia, randomized controlled trials (RCTs), RCT, and clinical trial. Searches were limited to English- and Chinese-language articles to date. Standardized mean differences (SMDs) with 95% confidence intervals were calculated using RevMan 5.4 to assess the effect size. Risk of bias was assessed using RoB 2.0.
Results: In total, 13 RCTs were identified (N = 681). Memantine was superior to placebo in treating negative symptoms, with an SMD of 0.79 (p = 0.0001, N = 631, 12 RCTs). Analysis of three studies whose corresponding authors provided original datasets showed an SMD of 2.16 (p = 0.25, N = 97) after adjusting for change in psychosis, depression, and extrapyramidal symptoms, suggesting that memantine is efficacious in treating PNS. Additionally, cognitive testing significantly improved, with an SMD of 0.66 (p = 0.0001, N = 395, eight RCTs). Positive symptoms were not significantly improved (SMD = 0.24, p = 0.1, N = 631, 12 RCTs).
Conclusions: To our knowledge, this is the first study showing a large effect size for treating PNS with memantine. Although statistical significance was not reached because of the small sample size (N = 97), the results were as expected because drugs such as memantine that act at NMDA receptors are unlikely to be effective as stand-alone treatments. Future RCTs should evaluate NMDAergic drugs in combination with complementary medications to optimize therapeutic effects for all three domains of schizophrenia psychopathology.
© 2025. This is a U.S. Government work and not under copyright protection in the US; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflicts of Interest: None. Ethics Statement: Institutional review board approval was not required for this meta-analysis. PRISMA guidelines were used. Funding: The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article. Code Availability: The meta-analysis was performed using RevMan 5.4. Availability of Data and Material: Studies included in this meta-analysis were openly available and sourced from PubMed, Cochrane Library, PsycINFO, EMBASE, or China Journal Net databases. Three authors provided original datasets. The data for this study are available upon request. The original datasets of certain studies are only available by contacting the corresponding authors of those studies. Author Contributions: Houlin Hong: Writing—Methodology, Software, Validation, Formal analysis, Investigation, Original draft preparation, Visualization. Jack Donlon: Writing—Investigation, Original draft preparation, Visualization. Martin Schaefer: Writing—Review and Editing. Susanne Sarkar: Writing—Review and Editing. Dragana Bugarski-Kirola: Writing—Review and Editing. Mujeeb U. Shad: Writing—Review and Editing. Wei Hou: Methodology, Validation, Formal analysis, Writing—Review and Editing. Matthias Kirschner: Writing—Review and Editing. Sajoy P. Varghese: Writing—Review and Editing. Ludmil Mitrev: Writing—Review and Editing. Valentina Echeverria: Writing—Review and Editing. John Dibato: Writing—Review and Editing. Selene R. T. Veerman: Writing—Review and Editing. Rohit Aiyer Writing—Review and Editing. Thomas N. Ferraro: Writing – Review and Editing. Gerardo Villarreal: Writing—Review and Editing. Shafiqur Rahman: Writing—Review and Editing. Trevor W. Stone: Writing – Review and Editing. Maju Mathew Koola: Conceptualization, Methodology, Investigation, Writing—Review and Editing, Visualization, Supervision. Two biostatisticians (HH and WH) completed the formal statistical analysis. Houlin Hong and Jack Donlon prepared the manuscript. All authors edited the manuscript with intellectual contributions and approved the final version of the manuscript. Disclaimer: The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Department of Veterans Affairs.
References
-
- American Psychiatric Association. Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders. 5th ed. American Psychiatric Publishing; 2013. - DOI
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
