Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 1;24(1):313.
doi: 10.1186/s12933-025-02835-0.

Association of C-reactive protein-triglyceride glucose index with the incidence and mortality of cardiovascular disease: a retrospective cohort study

Affiliations

Association of C-reactive protein-triglyceride glucose index with the incidence and mortality of cardiovascular disease: a retrospective cohort study

Yu Sun et al. Cardiovasc Diabetol. .

Abstract

Background: The C-reactive protein-triglyceride-glucose index (CTI) has emerged as an innovative composite marker for evaluating metabolic-inflammatory dysregulation, integrating markers of insulin resistance and systemic inflammation. However, the association between CTI and cardiovascular disease (CVD) or its mortality has rarely been studied. This study sought to examine CTI's associations with CVD mortality, CVD incidence, and all-cause mortality.

Methods: This study included 8,679 adults from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2001-2010, 2015-2018. The CTI was derived as: 0.412* Ln (CRP [mg/L]) + Ln (TG [mg/dl] × FPG [mg/dl])/2, with participants categorized into quartiles. We employed Kaplan-Meier curves, cox proportional hazards model, logistic regression analyses, and restricted cubic spline (RCS) to evaluate CTI's associations with CVD mortality, total CVD incidence, and all-cause mortality across sex-stratified, age-specific, and glycemic subgroups.

Results: In this study, CTI was significantly and positively associated with CVD mortality, total CVD incidence, and all-cause mortality. CTI significantly predicted both CVD mortality (HR 2.28 [1.69-3.24]) and all-cause mortality (HR 2.14 [1.76-2.55]). Additionally, the CTI index correlated with the risk of total CVD (OR 2.85, 95% CI 2.32-3.52), congestive heart failure (OR 3.66, 95% CI 2.46-5.35), coronary heart disease (OR 2.82, 95% CI 1.95-3.97), angina pectoris (OR 2.85, 95% CI 1.89-4.22), heart attack (OR 2.59, 95% CI 1.89-3.52), and stroke (OR 2.86, 95% CI 2.00-3.85). Specifically, the association was similar between male and female, and similar in young participants and elderly participants. In different glycemic status, high levels of CTI were found to be linked to an increased risk of CVD in individuals without diabetes mellitus (DM). However, this association was not observed in individuals with DM.

Conclusions: Our analysis revealed that elevated CTI levels were significantly associated with CVD incidence and mortality. CTI may emerge as a unique predictive marker for CVD risk.

Keywords: All-cause mortality; C-reactive protein-triglyceride glucose index; Cardiovascular disease; Cardiovascular disease mortality; NHANES.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: NHANES is conducted by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) and the National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS). And the NHANES study protocol was reviewed and approved by the NCHS Research Ethics Review Committee. All participants in NHANES provided written informed consent. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart depicting the participants’ selection
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot of the CTI association with CVD mortality, total CVD, and all-cause mortality using logistic regression model and Cox proportional hazards model
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Associations between CTI with CVD mortality, total CVD, congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, angina pectoris, heart attack, and stroke were evaluated by RCS after adjustment for the covariables. The solid lines correspond to the central estimates, and the shaded regions indicate the 95% confidence intervals. A CVD mortality; B Total CVD; C All-cause mortality; D Congestive heart failure; E Coronary heart disease; F Angina pectoris; G Heart attack; H Stroke
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot of the CTI association with CVD mortality, total CVD, and all-cause mortality using logistic regression model and Cox proportional hazards model in subgroups. A Gender; B Age; C Glycemic status
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Forest plot of the CTI association with CVD mortality, total CVD, and all-cause mortality using logistic regression model and Cox proportional hazards model in subgroups. A Gender; B Age; C Glycemic status
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
The Kaplan–Meier curves analysis depicts the cumulative incidence of CVD mortality and all-cause mortality across the CTI index quartiles. A All-cause mortality; B CVD mortality
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Comparison of the predictive value of CTI index for total CVD, congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, angina pectoris, heart attack, and stroke. a congestive heart failure; b coronary heart disease; c angina pectoris; d heart attack; e stroke; f Total CVD

References

    1. Vaduganathan M, Mensah GA, Turco JV, Fuster V, Roth GA. The global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk: a compass for future health. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2022;80(25):2361–71 ((in eng)). - PubMed
    1. Roth GA, et al. Global burden of cardiovascular diseases and risk factors, 1990–2019: update from the GBD 2019 study. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020;76(25):2982–3021 ((in eng)). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zhao D, Liu J, Wang M, Zhang X, Zhou M. Epidemiology of cardiovascular disease in China: current features and implications. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2019;16(4):203–12 ((in eng)). - PubMed
    1. Woodruff RC, et al. Trends in cardiovascular disease mortality rates and excess deaths, 2010–2022. Am J Prev Med. 2024;66(4):582–9 ((in eng)). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Virani SS, et al. Heart disease and stroke statistics-2020 update: a report from the american heart association. Circulation. 2020;141(9):e139–596 ((in eng)). - PubMed

MeSH terms