Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2025 Aug 1.
doi: 10.1038/s41443-025-01139-x. Online ahead of print.

Reservoir migration in inflatable penile prostheses: a systematic review and development of a clinical decision algorithm

Affiliations
Review

Reservoir migration in inflatable penile prostheses: a systematic review and development of a clinical decision algorithm

Erin Curran et al. Int J Impot Res. .

Abstract

The three-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) offers durable functional outcomes for men with medication-refractory erectile dysfunction. While rare, IPP reservoir migration can be significant. This systematic review aims to characterize the incidence of reservoir migration, assess migration outcomes across various placement techniques, and propose a clinical decision-making algorithm for reservoir placement. A comprehensive search of PubMed and the Cochrane Library was conducted on April 7, 2025, without filters. Eligible English-language studies reporting migration-related outcomes of functional IPP reservoirs were included. Data extraction and risk-of-bias assessments were performed using validated tools. Thirty-five studies were included: 19 case reports, 10 case series, and 6 cohort studies. A meta-analysis of proportions using a random-effects model was performed on 9 case series and 6 cohort studies (5783 patients), yielding a pooled migration rate of 0.2% (95% CI: 0.0%-0.6%) with moderate heterogeneity (I² = 54.2%). Sensitivity analyses yielded consistent results. The evidence is limited by small sample sizes, retrospective designs, and reporting variability. Migration risk is low but clinically significant and especially relevant in patients with altered pelvic anatomy. Based on findings, we propose a clinical algorithm incorporating patient risk factors to guide reservoir placement decisions.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests

References

    1. Wilson SK, Delk JR, Salem EA, Cleves MA. Long-term survival of inflatable penile prostheses: single surgical group experience with 2,384 first-time implants spanning two decades. J Sex Med. 2007;4:1074–9. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Bettocchi C, Palumbo F, Spilotros M, Lucarelli G, Palazzo S, Battaglia M, et al. Patient and partner satisfaction after AMS inflatable penile prosthesis implant. J Sex Med. 2010;7:304–9. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Chung E, Solomon M, DeYoung L, Brock GB. Clinical outcomes and patient satisfaction rates among elderly male aged ≥75 years with inflatable penile prosthesis implant for medically refractory erectile dysfunction. World J Urol. 2014;32:173–7. - PubMed - DOI
    1. Ji YS, Ko YH, Song PH, Moon KH. Long-term survival and patient satisfaction with inflatable penile prosthesis for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Korean J Urol. 2015;56:461–5. - PubMed - PMC - DOI
    1. Perito PE, Wilson SK. Traditional (retroperitoneal) and abdominal wall (ectopic) reservoir placement. J Sex Med. 2011;8:656–9. - PubMed - DOI