Ten steps to improve outcomes of in-facility neonatal resuscitation
- PMID: 40752674
- DOI: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2025.110746
Ten steps to improve outcomes of in-facility neonatal resuscitation
Abstract
Background: Up to 10 % of all newborns require assistance to breathe at birth. Although neonatal resuscitation guidelines and educational platforms exist, best practices to implement high-quality neonatal resuscitation care have not been defined.
Aim: To establish a Neonatal Global Resuscitation Alliance and develop ten steps to improve outcomes of in-facility neonatal resuscitation across global settings.
Methods: Three-stage iterative consensus-based process: (1) invited input from the neonatal resuscitation community to identify pertinent measures, (2) convened a face-to-face meeting of 28 global neonatal resuscitation content experts to refine consensus steps, (3) presented draft steps and related content to stakeholders; solicited public comment and revised ten steps based on feedback.
Results: The consensus-based ten steps include: Implement effective education systems; Ensure team and equipment readiness; Identify high-risk pregnancies and prevent perinatal risks; Respond to every birth; Perform guideline based resuscitation; Deliver guideline based post-resuscitation care; Collect data throughout resuscitation care; Improve quality of resuscitation; Support parent and family well-being; Cultivate a culture of excellence. For each of these steps, key concepts and suggested approaches to put the steps into practice are identified.
Conclusion: These ten steps to improve outcomes of in-facility neonatal resuscitation represent a clear framework for healthcare professionals, institutions, and policymakers to evaluate and strengthen their readiness, training, and response to newborns who need resuscitation at birth. This consensus-based guidance can be used to optimize in-facility neonatal resuscitation and improve outcomes for newborns worldwide.
Keywords: Global resuscitation alliance; Neonatal resuscitation; Ten steps.
Copyright © 2025 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: “Asmita Acharya reports a relationship with Laerdal Global Health that includes: employment. Jackie Patterson reports a relationship with Laerdal Global Health that includes: funding grants. Vinay Nadkarni reports a relationship with National Institutes of Health that includes: funding grants. Vinay Nadkarni reports a relationship with Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality that includes: funding grants. Vinay Nadkarni reports a relationship with US Department of Defense that includes: funding grants. Vinay Nadkarni reports a relationship with Zoll Medical that includes: funding grants. Vinay Nadkarni reports a relationship with Laerdal Foundation that includes: funding grants. Vinay Nadkarni reports a relationship with Nihon Kohden that includes: funding grants. Vinay Nadkarni reports a relationship with Philips that includes: funding grants. Vinay Nadkarni reports a relationship with Society of Critical Care Medicine that includes: board membership. Vinay Nadkarni reports a relationship with International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation that includes: board membership. Vinay Nadkarni reports a relationship with Citizen COR Foundation that includes: board membership. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.”.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources