Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2025 Aug 2;25(1):372.
doi: 10.1186/s12890-025-03843-2.

Rapid, season-specific PCR testing versus traditional diagnostics for pneumonia in the emergency department

Yangxiu Yu  1 , Qiuping Li  2
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Rapid, season-specific PCR testing versus traditional diagnostics for pneumonia in the emergency department

Yangxiu Yu et al. BMC Pulm Med. .

Abstract

Background: Traditional culture-based diagnostics for emergency-department (ED) pneumonia are slow and season-agnostic, delaying targeted therapy. We evaluated whether season-tailored multiplex PCR panels accelerate pathogen identification and improve antibiotic stewardship.

Methods: In a single-center, prospective study, adults with radiographically confirmed pneumonia were enrolled consecutively and allocated by a rotating week-on/week-off schedule to either a seasonal PCR panel or conventional diagnostics. Primary outcomes were (i) time to final pathogen report and (ii) diagnostic yield (≥ 1 pathogen detected). Secondary outcomes included empiric-antibiotic appropriateness within 24 h, regimen changes ≤ 72 h, antibiotic duration, length of stay (LOS) and 30-day mortality.

Results: Among 282 analyzable patients (spring = 140; autumn-winter = 142), PCR slashed turnaround time from 48 h to 12 h in spring and from 50 h to 14 h in autumn-winter (median difference - 36 h, 95% CI: - 42 to - 30; p < 0.001). Diagnostic yield rose from 61.6 to 80.6% in spring and from 56.8 to 80.0% in winter (risk differences 19.0 pp and 22.3 pp, respectively; both p < 0.01). In the winter cohort, guideline-concordant empiric therapy increased (78.7% vs. 64.9%; +13.8 pp) and antibiotic changes ≤ 72 h fell (14.7% vs. 28.4%; - 13.7 pp). Mean antibiotic courses shortened by 1.5-1.7 days across seasons, while LOS showed a non-significant 1-2-day reduction. Thirty-day mortality did not differ. Effects were consistent in older adults (≥ 65 y) and patients with COPD.

Conclusions: Locally adapted, season-specific multiplex PCR panels deliver near-four-fold faster, higher-yield pathogen detection and support measurable stewardship gains without compromising safety. Implementation in other settings should consider local pathogen seasonality, workflow, and cost structures.

Keywords: Diagnostic accuracy; Emergency department; PCR test panel; Pneumonia diagnosis; Seasonal infections.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Ethical approval was obtained from the hospital’s institutional review board Shanghai Public Health Clinical Center (2023-S072-01). All procedures complied with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to enrollment. Consent for publication: Not Applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flowchart for patient screening, eligibility, allocation. Of 356 adults screened, 304 fulfilled inclusion criteria. Ten declined consents, and 12 were excluded after enrolment (non-infectious infiltrate = 5; imaging reinterpretation = 4; repeat ED visit within 30 days = 3). The remaining 282 participants constituted the ITT population. They were split a-priori into a spring cohort (n = 140) and an autumn–winter cohort (n = 142); each cohort was allocated by rotating-week schedule to the season-tailored multiplex PCR panel or to conventional diagnostics. Final numbers analyzed by arm are shown within each box
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Krishnan PS. (2024). The Deep Dive into the Use of Image Processing and Object Detection to Identify Pneumonia. 2024 International Symposium on Networks, Computers and Communications (ISNCC), 1–9.
    1. Sabbagh WA, Karrar HR, Nouh MI, Alkhaifi NM, Badayyan SY, Shaikh LK, Ghamdi A, N. A., Abdullah FF. Perspective of pneumonia in the health-care setting. J Pharm Res Int. 2024;36(7):51–8. 10.9734/jpri/2024/v36i77538.
    1. Garber B. Pneumonia Update for Emergency Clinicians. Curr Emerge Hos Med Reports. 2022;10(3):36–44. 10.1007/s40138-022-00246-z. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kim TJ, Lee KH, Choe YH, Lee KS. Pulmonary infection (pneumonia). Emergency chest radiology. Singapore: Springer; 2021. pp. 85–102. 10.1007/978-981-33-4396-2_8.
    1. Ojuawo O, Ojuawo A, Aladesanmi A, Adio M, Iroh Tam PY. Childhood pneumonia diagnostics: a narrative review. Expert Rev Respir Med. 2022;16(7):775–85. 10.1080/17476348.2022.2099842. - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources