Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2025 Oct;64(10):1561-1574.
doi: 10.1007/s40262-025-01550-z. Epub 2025 Aug 3.

A Phase IIa, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Brensocatib in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

A Phase IIa, Single-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Parallel-Group Study to Assess Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetics/Pharmacodynamics of Brensocatib in Adults with Cystic Fibrosis

Michael W Konstan et al. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2025 Oct.

Abstract

Background and objectives: Brensocatib, an oral, competitive, and reversible inhibitor of dipeptidyl peptidase 1 (DPP1), reduces exacerbations and lung function decline in non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis (NCFBE). This study aimed to evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), safety, and tolerability of brensocatib in adults with cystic fibrosis (CF), comparing these findings with data from previous trials in healthy adults and in those with NCFBE to inform dose selection for future clinical trials.

Methods: A phase IIa, single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial was conducted to assess the PK, PD, safety, and tolerability of brensocatib in adults with CF. Participants were randomly assigned to receive once-daily brensocatib (10 mg, 25 mg, or 40 mg) or placebo for 28 days. The study planned enrollment of up to 34 adults, stratified on the basis of their CF transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator use, to evaluate the PK profile of brensocatib and its safety compared with placebo. Primary PK parameters, including maximum plasma concentration (Cmax), time to maximum concentration (Tmax), area under the concentration-time curve from 0 to 24 h (AUC0-24), and half-life (t1/2), were determined on day 1 and day 28. Dose-dependency of brensocatib exposure was analyzed, and safety and tolerability were assessed through treatment-emergent adverse events. Data from participants were compared with previous data from healthy adults and from those with NCFBE.

Results: A total of 29 participants were randomized to treatment, with 21 stratified to the CFTR modulator group. Baseline characteristics were similar among cohorts. Mean age was 37.9 (standard deviation (SD) 14.6) years, and most participants exhibited mild-to-moderate lung disease. PK analysis showed dose-dependent and predictable brensocatib exposure, with comparable profiles between participants with and without use of CFTR modulators. In addition, PK profiles in participants were comparable to those of healthy adults and of those with NCFBE. Pharmacodynamic analysis revealed dose-dependent reduction in neutrophil serine protease (NSP) activity, reaching saturation around the 25-mg dose, particularly in blood. Brensocatib at all doses was well tolerated with no new identified safety signals.

Conclusions: Brensocatib demonstrated consistent PK profiles independent of CFTR therapy and comparable to those of healthy and NCFBE adults. Brensocatib reduced blood and sputum NSP levels. The safety profile was comparable to previous studies, with no new safety concerns identified, supporting the use of similar dosing for adults with CF as for other populations. These findings advocate for further investigation of brensocatib in CF.

Clinical trial registration: NCT05090904.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Funding: This study was funded by Insmed Incorporated (Bridgewater, NJ, USA). Conflicts of Interest: Michael Konstan reports consulting fees from Insmed Incorporated. James Tolle and Emily DiMango have nothing to disclose. Patrick Flume reports consulting fees and research support from Insmed Incorporated. Helen Usansky, Ariel Teper, Christina Ramirez, Jimmy Flarakos, Jessica Basso, Sherry Li, and Marcela Vergara are employees and shareholders in Insmed Incorporated. Ethics Approval: This study was conducted in accordance with the protocol and consensus ethical principles derived from international guidelines, including the Declaration of Helsinki, Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences International Ethical Guidelines, applicable International Council for Harmonisation Good Clinical Practices Guidelines, and other applicable laws and regulations. Consent to Participate: Participants and/or their legally authorized representative were informed that their participation was voluntary. Participants or their legally authorized representative were required to sign a statement of informed consent that met the requirements of ICH E6 (R2) guideline for good clinical practice (GCP) and any additional elements required by local regulations. Consent for Publication: Not applicable. Availability of Data and Material: The datasets generated and/or analyzed during the current study are not publicly available owing to patient privacy. Authors’ Contributions: Helen Usansky, Ariel Teper, and Marcela Vergara contributed to the study conception and design. All authors contributed to data collection, analysis, and interpretation. All authors critically reviewed all manuscript drafts, approved the submitted version of the manuscript, and made the decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Study design. The negative days denote the screening period, while the positive days indicate the treatment and follow-up periods. These phases were contiguous, occurring in immediate succession with no intervals. aParticipants began study treatment at the start of either their on- or off-treatment cycled antibiotic regimen, if applicable. CFTR cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, QD once daily
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Summary of participant disposition. CFTR cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, QD once daily
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Mean (+SD) brensocatib plasma concentration profile on a day 1 and b day 28 following brensocatib once-daily oral administration with or without concomitant use of CFTR modulators. CFTR cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator, QD once daily, SD standard deviation
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Plasma concentration of brensocatib once daily at day 1 compared with day 28 in participants with CF compared with healthy adultsa and those with NCFBEb,c. aData were included from healthy adults from a phase I study of the safety, tolerability, and PK of brensocatib 10, 25, and 40 mg [18]. bData were included from adults with NCFBE treated with brensocatib 10 mg or 25 mg in the phase II WILLOW study [15]. cData for the 40-mg arm were not available for adults with NCFBE. CF cystic fibrosis, NCFBE non-cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis, PK pharmacokinetics
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Median % reduction of NE activity in blood and sputum relative to baseline on day 29. Data are for the pharmacodynamic analysis set. Values below the limit of quantitation are included in the analysis using lower limit of quantification / 2. Percent reduction is defined as 100×1-post-baselinevaluebaselinevalue. NE neutrophil elastase
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Reduction of NSP activity with increasing brensocatib exposure. AUCtau area under the plasma concentration–time curve during a dosage interval, CatG cathepsin G, Cmax maximum plasma concentration, Ctrough concentration immediately prior to dosing, ECmax maximum inhibition, NE neutrophil elastase, NSP neutrophil serine proteinase, PR3 proteinase 3

References

    1. Ghigo A, Prono G, Riccardi E, De Rose V. Dysfunctional inflammation in cystic fibrosis airways: from mechanisms to novel therapeutic approaches. Int J Mol Sci. 2021;22(4):1952. 10.3390/ijms22041952. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Konstan MW, Berger M. Current understanding of the inflammatory process in cystic fibrosis: onset and etiology. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1997;24(2):137–42. https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/(SICI)1099-0496(199708)24:2%... - DOI - PubMed
    1. Berger M. Inflammatory mediators in cystic fibrosis lung disease. Allergy Asthma Proc. 2002;23(1):19-25. https://www.ingentaconnect.com/content/ocean/aap/2002/00000023/00000001/... - PubMed
    1. Sly PD, Gangell CL, Chen L, Ware RS, Ranganathan S, Mott LS, et al. Risk factors for bronchiectasis in children with cystic fibrosis. N Engl J Med. 2013;368(21):1963–70. 10.1056/NEJMoa1301725 - PubMed
    1. Landini N, Ciet P, Janssens HM, Bertolo S, Ros M, Mattone M, et al. Management of respiratory tract exacerbations in people with cystic fibrosis: focus on imaging. Front Pediatr. 2023;10:1084313. 10.3389/fped.2022.1084313. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

Associated data