Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;28(4):e70346.
doi: 10.1111/hex.70346.

Public Involvement in Complex Theorising: A Co-Produced Logic Model of the Role of Context in Shaping Child Health

Affiliations

Public Involvement in Complex Theorising: A Co-Produced Logic Model of the Role of Context in Shaping Child Health

Dylan Kneale et al. Health Expect. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: There is increasing work towards drawing on theory, implementing co-production and accounting for complexity within the production of systematic reviews for public health. In this paper, we report on the process of co-producing a theory; in this case, a graphical articulation of theory in the form of a logic model, which describes how contextual factors influence children's health.

Methods: We undertook a series of three online co-production workshops, involving 18-20 participants in each, and worked with an advisory group of experts with professional and lived expertise. An online virtual whiteboard was used to support the identification of factors that contributed to poorer childhood health, explanations for these factors, and connections between different factors.

Results: Driven by government strategy, we initially focussed our work on childhood obesity. However, co-production was transformational in switching the focus of the logic model away from a narrow focus on Body Mass Index as a measure of obesity, to a more holistic theory of factors that shape children's health, recognised as the intersection between healthy eating, physical activity and mental well-being. Theorising with a diverse range of co-producers helped us to recognise the stigmatising impacts that an exclusive focus on clinical measures of children's health can have, and the way that a narrow clinical focus inhibits theorising the complexity and drivers of poorer health.

Conclusion: Co-production led to a switch in theorising away from narratives of children's health that focus closely on personal responsibility, towards narratives that explore structural and contextual drivers of health.

Patient or public contribution: The logic model was entirely driven by the contributions of researchers, those with lived experience (e.g., as parents and/or who have experienced poor health), and those with professional experience (e.g., as teachers) who worked together to co-produce the model. An advisory group composed of people with a similar range of expertise helped to shape the conduct of co-production and dissemination (including in the preparation of this manuscript).

Keywords: children's health; complex systems; co‐production; logic model; weight management.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Process for Workshops 1 and 2.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Section of the logic model (see explanation in text).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Section of logic model focusing on food culture themes (see explanation in text).

References

    1. Noyes J., Hendry M., Lewin S., Glenton C., Booth A., and Garside R.. 2015. Guidance for Review Authors on Choice and Use of Social Theory in Complex Intervention Reviews. Version 10. Cochrane.
    1. Thomas J., Kneale D., Booth A., Garside R., and Noyes J., “Selecting and Using Theory,” in Cochrane‐Campbell Handbook for Qualitative Evidence Synthesis, ed. Noyes J. and Harden A. (Wiley, 2024).
    1. O'Mara‐Eves A., Laidlaw L., Candy B., Vigurs C., Collis A., and Kneale D.. The Value of Co‐Production Research Project: A Rapid Critical Review of the Evidence. 2022.
    1. Funnell S. C. and Rogers P. J., Purposeful Program Theory: Effective Use of Theories of Change and Logic Models (John Wiley & Sons, 2011).
    1. Rehfuess E. A., Booth A., Brereton L., et al., “Towards a Taxonomy of Logic Models in Systematic Reviews and Health Technology Assessments: A Priori, Staged, and Iterative Approaches,” Research Synthesis Methods 9, no. 1 (2018): 13–24. - PubMed