Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2023 May 8;2(2):218-227.
doi: 10.3390/muscles2020016.

Analysis of Muscle Strength and Electromyographic Activity during Different Deadlift Positions

Affiliations

Analysis of Muscle Strength and Electromyographic Activity during Different Deadlift Positions

Vinícius Marques Moreira et al. Muscles. .

Abstract

The aim of the study was to analyze muscle activation in the three positions of the deadlift (DL). Twenty male participants (33.4 ± 3.9 years; 42.2 ± 9.1 months of experience with DL; 91.0 ± 14.8 kg; and 1.78 ± 0.06 m) pulled a bar through isometric actions in three DL positions: lift-off, mid-pull, and lockout. Isometric strength, knee angle, and activation of the rectus femoris (RF), biceps femoris (BF), lateral gastrocnemius (GAL), and erector spinae (ERE) muscles were collected. The analysis of variance showed that the maximum isometric force presented differences between the positions (p = 0.001; η2 = 0.973) considered large with higher values at the mid-pull position. Interactions were found between muscles and position (p = 0.001; η2 = 0.527) considered large. The RF and ERE showed greater activation in the lift-off position, while in the mid-pull position, there was greater activation of the BF and GAL muscles. The DL positions produce different activations in the bi-articular and uni-articular muscles. The lift-off requires more activation from the RF and ERE positions. The mid-pull position, despite generating greater force, presented greater activations in the BF and GAL. The ERE showed higher activations as the external torque was greater.

Keywords: electromyography; isometric strength; muscle activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Muscle strength and knee joint range in the three DL positions. * Significant difference in relative strength for the lift-off position (p < 0.05).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Muscle activity in relation to DL positions. * Significant difference (p < 0.05) for the lift-off position. ¥ Significant difference (p < 0.05) for the mid-pull position.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Illustration of the 3 DL positions analyzed: lift-off, mid-pull, and lock-out.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Evaluation of a participant and electrode placements: (1) rectus femoris muscle, (2) biceps femoris muscle, (3) lateral gastrocnemius muscle, (4) erector spinae muscle, and (5) reference electrode.

References

    1. O’Reilly M.A., Whelan D.F., Ward T.E., Delahunt E., Caulfield B.M. Classification of deadlift biomechanics with wearable inertial measurement units. J. Biomech. 2017;58:155–161. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.04.028. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Choe K.H., Coburn J.W., Costa P.B., Pamukoff D.N. Hip and Knee Kinetics During a Back Squat and Deadlift. J. Strength Cond. Res. 2021;35:1364–1371. doi: 10.1519/JSC.0000000000002908. - DOI - PubMed
    1. McGuigan M., Wilson B., McGuigan M.W. Biomechanical Analysis of the Deadlift. J. Strength Cond. Res. 1996;10:250–255.
    1. Lee S., Schultz J., Timgren J., Staelgraeve K., Miller M., Liu Y. An electromyographic and kinetic comparison of conventional and Romanian deadlifts. J. Exerc. Sci. Fit. 2018;16:87–93. doi: 10.1016/j.jesf.2018.08.001. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mohamed O., Perry J., Hislop H. Relationship between wire EMG activity, muscle length; and torque of the hamstrings. Clin. Biomech. 2002;17:569–579. doi: 10.1016/S0268-0033(02)00070-0. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources