Neuropeptide S pathway in PTSD and neuropsychiatric disorders: A review
- PMID: 40758097
- PMCID: PMC12505535
- DOI: 10.17305/bb.2025.12861
Neuropeptide S pathway in PTSD and neuropsychiatric disorders: A review
Abstract
Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) is a multidimensional illness that seldom occurs alone: roughly 80 % of patients also meet criteria for anxiety, depression, chronic pain, substance-use, eating or cognitive disorders. Converging genetic, neurochemical and behavioural findings implicate the neuropeptide S (NPS) system-acting through its G-protein-coupled NPS receptor (NPSR)-as a common regulator of these diverse phenotypes. This narrative review surveys studies published 2000-2024 in PubMed, Embase and Web of Science that examine NPS/NPSR involvement in core PTSD features and typical comorbidities. The functional rs324981 A/T polymorphism, which boosts NPSR surface expression and signalling, consistently associates with greater PTSD risk and symptom severity. In rodent models, exogenous NPS reduces anxiety- and fear-like behaviours, speeds fear-memory extinction, stabilises the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal axis, enhances dopaminergic tone and elevates hippocampal brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF)-changes concordant with symptom relief. Additional work shows that NPS lessens pain affect, dampens alcohol and opioid intake, eases withdrawal-induced anxiety and lowers food consumption, hinting at a multimodal therapeutic profile. These effects converge on limbic and mid-brain circuits (amygdala, ventral tegmental area, locus coeruleus, paraventricular nucleus) and engage oxytocinergic, adenosinergic and endocannabinoid pathways. Translation remains limited by NPS's rapid degradation, poor blood-brain-barrier penetration and scarcity of brain-penetrant NPSR ligands, but advances in intranasal delivery, lipid-acylated analogues, biased NPSR agonists and "humanised" NPSR-variant models offer promising solutions. Collectively, current pre-clinical and genetic evidence positions the NPS-NPSR axis as a versatile therapeutic target for both core PTSD symptoms and their disabling comorbidities, warranting rigorous translational studies to refine mechanism, optimise drug-like properties and test clinical efficacy.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflicts of interest: Author declares no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Kilpatrick DG, Ruggiero KJ, Acierno R, Saunders BE, Resnick HS, Best CL. Violence and risk of PTSD, major depression, substance abuse/dependence, and comorbidity: results from the National Survey of Adolescents. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2003;71(4):692–700. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-006X.71.4.692. - PubMed
-
- Atwoli L, Stein DJ, Koenen KC, McLaughlin KA. Epidemiology of posttraumatic stress disorder: prevalence, correlates and consequences. Curr Opin Psychiatry. 2015;28(4):307–11. https://doi.org/10.1097/YCO.0000000000000167. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Hong S, Kim H, Park MK. Impact of COVID-19 on post-traumatic stress symptoms in the general population: an integrative review. Int J Ment Health Nurs. 2021;30(4):834–46. https://doi.org/10.1111/inm.12875. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Ouyang H, Geng S, Zhou Y, Wang J, Zhan J, Shang Z, et al. The increase of PTSD in front-line health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic and the mediating role of risk perception: a one-year follow-up study. Transl Psychiatry. 2022;12(1):180. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41398-022-01953-7. - PMC - PubMed
-
- Riaz BK, Islam MZ, Ahmed HU, Akhtar K, Haque A, Amin KMB, et al. Post-traumatic stress disorders and coping strategies of health professionals during COVID-19 pandemic in Bangladesh: findings of a countrywide cross-sectional study. Lancet Reg Health Southeast Asia. 2023;11:100131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lansea.2022.100131. - PMC - PubMed
