Answer to the letter to the editor of Y. Zhu, et al. concerning "percutaneous pedicle screw placement with a mini-open decompression versus open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: one-year results of a randomised controlled trial" by A. Broekema, et al. (Eur spine J [2025]: doi:10.1007/s00586-025-08855-4)
- PMID: 40758178
- DOI: 10.1007/s00586-025-09211-2
Answer to the letter to the editor of Y. Zhu, et al. concerning "percutaneous pedicle screw placement with a mini-open decompression versus open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: one-year results of a randomised controlled trial" by A. Broekema, et al. (Eur spine J [2025]: doi:10.1007/s00586-025-08855-4)
Conflict of interest statement
Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no relevant conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Broekema A et al (2025) Percutaneous pedicle screw placement with a mini-open decompression versus open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis: one-year results of a randomised controlled trial. Eur Spine J. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00586-025-08855-4 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Kim CW, Doerr TM, Yanni DS et al (2011) Minimally invasive spine surgery training: a survey of spine fellows and spine fellowship directors. Spine (Phila Pa 1976);36(26):E1729–E1733
-
- Wang TY, Adogwa O, Fatemi P et al (2015) A systematic review of complications associated with minimally invasive spine surgery. J Neurosurg Spine;23(4):438–449.
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
