Outpatient Stoma Closure in 130 Patients: Insights From the GRECCAR Multicentric Study
- PMID: 40758433
- DOI: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000006875
Outpatient Stoma Closure in 130 Patients: Insights From the GRECCAR Multicentric Study
Abstract
Objective: Evaluate feasibility and outcomes of outpatient stoma closure.
Background: Stoma closure is a routine procedure still associated with prolonged hospital stays, despite a low complication rate. We hypothesized that it could be performed in an outpatient setting.
Methods: This retrospective observational study analyzed prospectively collected data on outpatient stoma closures across 5 centers (5/2019-10/2024) was conducted. Inclusion required a caregiver on surgery day and no associated procedures. Follow-up consisted of phone consultations, a 24/7 emergency contact line, and routine outpatient appointment.
Results: One hundred thirty patients [57% male, median age=60 years, American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) score 1-2=94%] were included. One hundred twenty-two loop ileostomies (94%), 5 loop colostomies (4%), and 3 ileocolostomies(3%) were closed. Stoma had been performed mainly after anterior resection (81%) or ileal pouch-anal anastomosis (9%). The median interval before stoma closure was 70 days [7-2310]. Median operative time was 48 minutes [20-247]. Anastomosis was mainly stapled (55.4%). Wounds were closed either directly (56%) or with a purse-string technique (44%). Same-day discharge was possible for 90% of patients. Main reasons for admission were postoperative pain (n=5) and logistical issues (n=4). Median length of hospital stay was 10 hours [4-16]. Twenty-one patients (16%) were readmitted after a median time of 6 days [1-14] (ileus=9, parietal abscess=5). Severe morbidity (Dindo III) was 3%. Direct wound closure was a risk factor of wound infection ( P =0.009). Steroid therapy was a risk factor of morbidity and readmission ( P <0.001).
Conclusions: Outpatient stoma closure is a safe and effective approach with low complication and readmission rates when using appropriate protocols.
Keywords: colorectal surgery; enhanced recovery pathway; outpatient surgery; stoma closure.
Copyright © 2025 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest.
References
-
- Seux H, Gignoux B, Blanchet MC, et al. Ambulatory colectomy for cancer: results from a prospective bicentric study of 177 patients. J Surg Oncol. 2023;127:434–440.
-
- Collard MK, Anyla M, Lefevre JH, et al. Patients’ refusal as major limitation of early discharge after colorectal resection in an enhanced recovery program. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2020;405:337–344.
-
- Turner GA, Clifford KA, Holloway R, et al. The impact of prolonged delay to loop ileostomy closure on postoperative morbidity and hospital stay: a retrospective cohort study. Colorectal Dis. 2022;24:854–861.
-
- Sier MF, van Gelder L, Ubbink DT, et al. Factors affecting timing of closure and non-reversal of temporary ileostomies. Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015;30:1185–1192.
-
- Charbonneau J, Morin G, Paré XG, et al. Loop ileostomy closure as a 23-hour stay procedure with preoperative efferent limb enteral stimulation: a randomized controlled trial. Dis Colon Rectum. 2024;67:466–475.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
