Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 4;25(1):1262.
doi: 10.1186/s12885-025-14659-y.

Evaluation of pre-treatment F-18 FDG PET/CT according to Mandard classification in locally advanced rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Affiliations

Evaluation of pre-treatment F-18 FDG PET/CT according to Mandard classification in locally advanced rectal cancer patients undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy

Feray Aras et al. BMC Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: This study primarily aimed to assess whether baseline [(18)F] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET/CT metabolic parameters-including SUVmax, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), and total lesion glycolysis (TLG)-can predict tumor regression grade (TRG) and survival in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer (LARC) undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT). In addition, secondary analyses were performed to identify other clinical and pathological variables associated with treatment response and prognosis.

Methods: This retrospective study included patients diagnosed with LARC who underwent nCRT followed by surgical resection between 2014 and 2023. Pre-treatment staging with F-18 FDG PET/CT was performed for all patients. Postoperative pathological response was assessed using the TRG system. Patients were categorized into two groups: complete responders (TRG1) and incomplete responders (TRG2-5). Demographic characteristics, PET/CT metabolic parameters (SUVmax, MTV, TLG), Carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), Carbohydrate antigen 19 - 9 (CA19-9), and histopathological features (perforation, lymphovascular invasion [LVI], and perineural invasion [PNI]) were compared between the groups. Statistical analyses included chi-square tests, Mann-Whitney U tests, logistic regression models with odds ratios (ORs), and Kaplan-Meier survival analysis.

Results: A total of 151 patients were included. A statistically significant difference was found between TRG1 and TRG2-5 groups regarding family history (p = 0.034), CEA at diagnosis (p = 0.002), Ca19.9 after radiotherapy (p = 0.045), and presence of concurrent chemotherapy (CC) (p = 0.004). Significant differences were also observed in postoperative pathological features, including perforation (p = 0.045), LVI (p = 0.023), PNI (p = 0.031), and post-operative CEA levels (p = 0.001). In terms of outcomes, TRG1 was associated with better survival (p = 0.001), longer disease-free survival (p = 0.001), and overall survival (p = 0.001). Logistic regression identified independent predictors of complete response (TRG1): family history (OR: 5.08, p = 0.027), post-RT CEA (OR: 0.61, p = 0.015), post-op CEA (OR: 1.13, p = 0.012), perforation (OR: 20.93, p = 0.033), LVI (OR: 0.33, p = 0.042), and PNI (OR: 0.49, p = 0.045). Kaplan-Meier analysis demonstrated significantly longer overall survival in patients with TRG1 compared to TRG2-5 (log-rank p = 0.001). Similarly, disease-free survival was significantly better in the TRG1 group (log-rank p = 0.001). In the multivariate Cox regression model, TRG1 (HR: 0.41; 95% CI: 0.26-0.66; p = 0.001), CC (HR: 0.62; 95% CI: 0.39-0.98; p = 0.039), and absence of perforation (HR: 0.51; 95% CI: 0.28-0.95; p = 0.034) were found to be independent predictors of improved survival.

Conclusions: Baseline F-18 FDG PET/CT parameters, including SUVmax, MTV, and TLG, were not predictive of TRG or survival in patients with LARC undergoing neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy. However, clinical and pathological variables such as family history, post-treatment CEA levels, perforation, lymphovascular invasion, and perineural invasion were significantly associated with TRG1. TRG1, histopathological subtype, perforation, and CC were also found to be independent predictors of survival. These findings suggest that while FDG-PET/CT may have limited utility in predicting treatment response, certain clinical and pathological features remain critical for outcome assessment.

Keywords: (18F) FDG PET/CT; Locally advanced rectal cancer; Mandard classification; Neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the decision of University Faculty of Medicine Health Sciences Ethics Committee (Date: 23.11.2022 and approval no: 1582. Informed consent to participate was obtained from all participants in the study. The Declaration of Helsinki protocol was followed in the research protocol. Our study is a retrospective study. Consent for publication: Not applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
A Pre-treatment axial F-18 FDG PET/CT image of a patient with TRG1 (complete pathological response). The primary lesion in the rectum shows moderate FDG uptake (SUVmax: 12.3; MTV: 18 mL; TLG: 156). B Pre-treatment axial F-18 FDG PET/CT image of a patient with TRG5 (poor response). The lesion demonstrates intense FDG uptake (SUVmax: 22.7; MTV: 38 mL; TLG: 435)”
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Forest plot of multivariate Cox regression analysis for overall survival. Hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) are shown for independent predictors
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Kaplan–Meier curves for overall and disease-free survival according to tumor regression grade (TRG)

Similar articles

References

    1. Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F. Global cancer statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2021;71(3):209–49. 10.3322/caac.21660. - PubMed
    1. Keller DS, Berho M, Perez RO, Wexner SD, Chand M. The multidisciplinary management of rectal cancer. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2020;17(7):414–29. 10.1038/s41575-020-0275-y. - PubMed
    1. Costas-Chavarri A, Nandakumar G, Temin S, Lopes G, Cervantes A, Cruz Correa M, Engineer R, Hamashima C, Ho GF, Huitzil FD, Malekzadeh Moghani M, Sharara AI, Stern MC, Teh C, Vazquez Manjarrez SE, Verjee A, Yantiss R, Shah MA. Treatment of patients with early-stage colorectal cancer: ASCO resource-stratified guideline. J Glob Oncol. 2019;5:1–19. 10.1200/JGO.18.00214. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Aguiar Junior S, Oliveira MM, Silva D, Mello CAL, Calsavara VF, Curado MP. Survival of patients with colorectal cancer in a cancer center. Arq Gastroenterol. 2020;57(2):172–7. 10.1590/S0004-2803.202000000-32. - PubMed
    1. Bray F, Laversanne M, Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A. Global cancer statistics 2022: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin. 2024. 10.3322/caac.21834. - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources