Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 4:15910199251348514.
doi: 10.1177/15910199251348514. Online ahead of print.

Flow diverter stent for the treatment of ruptured distal anterior cerebral artery: A retrospective multicenter analysis from CRETA registry

Affiliations

Flow diverter stent for the treatment of ruptured distal anterior cerebral artery: A retrospective multicenter analysis from CRETA registry

Giancarlo Salsano et al. Interv Neuroradiol. .

Abstract

BackgroundData on off-label use of flow diverter for ruptured distal anterior cerebral artery aneurysms (rDACAAs) are limited. The purpose of the present study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of flow diversion for rDACAAs in a large multicenter cohort.MethodsA retrospective observational study on consecutive patients who were treated with flow diversion for rDACAAs at 8 centers in 4 countries was performed. Primary outcome was the occlusion rate of the target aneurysm at the last radiological follow-up. Secondary outcomes included good clinical outcome, retreatment, technical success, procedure-related complications, radiological outcome of the covered branches and mortality rate.ResultsA total of 21 patients with 21 rDACAAs were treated between January 2017 and December 2024. Thirteen patients were women (61.9%) and the median age was 54 years (IQR 46-66). The most common etiology was saccular (71.4%), followed by dissecting (23.8%) and mycotic (4.8%). In all patients a single stent was successful deployed. Median imaging follow-up was 9 (7-12) months. At last follow-up adequate occlusion was 95.2%. Symptomatic thromboembolic or hemorrhagic complications occurred in 9.5% of patients. Seventeen patients (81%) had good clinical outcome (mRS 0-2) with mortality rate of 9.5%. In-stent stenosis occurred in one case that was conservatively managed without major concerns.ConclusionsFlow diversion is feasible as a potential treatment strategy for acutely ruptured aneurysms arising from distal anterior cerebral artery. Flow diverter may represent a valid option whenever other treatments are considered challenging or high risk.

Keywords: Ruptured aneurysm; distal anterior cerebral aneurysm; flow diverter stent.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Enrollment flow chart. DACA, distal anterior cerebral artery. SAH, subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A): coronal turbo FLAIR showing edema of cingulate gyrus and corpus callosum associated with adjacent flow void suggesting distal aneurysm of the anterior cerebral artery. (B): SWI sequence subarachnoid hemorrhage within the sulci of the cerebral convexities bilaterally. (D): DSA showing mycotic aneurysm located at the bifurcation of the pericallosal and callosomarginal arteries. (E): DSA performed after coil embolization identifies partial thrombosis of pericallosal artery that was successfully treated with tirofiban. (F): DSA 2 days after coiling treatment shows recanalization and enlargement of aneurysmal sac. (G): deployment of flow-diverter stent (Silk Vista Baby 2.5 × 15 mm). (C): 8 months post-treatment MRI showing complete occlusion of the aneurysm without early and late ischemic events.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
(A): ct image showing an intraparenchymal hematoma in the fronto-mesial region associated with a minimal adjacent subarachnoid hemorrhage. (B) and (C): DSA before and after embolization with coils of a saccular aneurysm located at the bifurcation of the pericallosal and callosomarginal arteries. (D): DSA 4 days after the hemorrhage showing partial recanalization of the aneurysmal neck. (E) and (F): Endovascular treatment with placement of a Silk Vista Baby 2.5 × 15 mm flow-diverter stent. (G) and (H): 6 months post-treatment DSA showing complete occlusion of the aneurysm.

References

    1. Kühn AL, Gounis MJ, Puri AS. Introduction: history and development of flow diverter technology and evolution. Neurosurgery 2020; 86: S3–S10. - PubMed
    1. Patel PD, Chalouhi N, Atallah E, et al. Off-label uses of the pipeline embolization device: a review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus 2017; 42: E4. - PubMed
    1. Griessenauer CJ, Ogilvy CS, Foreman PM, et al. Pipeline embolization device for small intracranial aneurysms: evaluation of safety and efficacy in a multicenter cohort. Neurosurgery 2017; 80: 579–5878. - PubMed
    1. Fischer S, Perez MA, Kurre W, et al. Pipeline embolization device for the treatment of intra and extracranial fusiform and dissecting aneurysms: initial experience and long-term follow-up. Neurosurgery 2014; 75: 364–374. - PubMed
    1. Rouchaud A, Brinjikji W, Cloft HJet al. et al. Endovascular treatment of ruptured blister-like aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis with focus on deconstructive versus reconstructive and flow-diverter treatments. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2015; 36: 2331–2339. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources