Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 21:16:1641632.
doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2025.1641632. eCollection 2025.

Distribution of human-pathogenic Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in crab-eating macaques in China

Affiliations

Distribution of human-pathogenic Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis, and Enterocytozoon bieneusi in crab-eating macaques in China

Huilin Zhang et al. Front Microbiol. .

Abstract

Introduction: The positive rates and genetic identity of Cryptosporidium spp., Giardia duodenalis (G. duodenalis), and Enterocytozoon bieneusi (E. bieneusi) were unclear in crab-eating macaques in Suzhou and Beijing, China.

Methods: A total of 504 fecal samples were collected from crab-eating macaques on commercial farms in Beijing and Suzhou, China. The extracted DNA was analyzed for Cryptosporidium spp. and E. bieneusi by nested PCR and sequence analysis of the small subunit rRNA (SSU rRNA) gene and the internal transcribed spacer (ITS) gene, respectively. The G. duodenalis was detected by nested PCR targeting β-giardin (bg) gene, glutamate dehydrogenase (gdh) gene, and triosephosphate isomerase (tpi) gene. The C. hominis identified were further subtyped by nested PCR and sequence analysis of the 60 kDa glycoprotein (gp60) gene.

Results: All 504 fecal samples collected from crab-eating macaques, the detection rates of Cryptosporidium spp., G. duodenalis, and E. bieneusi were 11.9% (60/504), 5.6% (28/504), and 4.6% (23/504), respectively. The 15.1% (44/292) detection rate of Cryptosporidium spp. from crab-eating macaques in Suzhou was significantly higher than that in Beijing (2.8%; 6/212; χ 2 = 20.6, df = 1, p < 0.0001). The detection rates of Cryptosporidium spp. and G. duodenalis were significant different between <2 months old animals and >24 months old animals (χ 2 = 104.7, df = 1, p < 0.0001; χ 2 = 6.6, df = 1, p = 0.0104). In contrast, there was no significant different in the detection rate of E. bieneusi in two age groups (χ 2 = 2.2, df = 1, p = 0.1360). A total of one Cryptosporidium species, one G. duodenalis assemblage B, and 4 E. bieneusi genotypes have been identified, including C. hominis (n = 60), assemblage B (n = 28), CM1 (n = 14), Peru8 (n = 5), D (n = 3), and Type IV (n = 1). Among 60 C. hominis samples, five subtypes of five subtype families were successfully identified at the gp60 gene: IbA13G4 (n = 27), InA26 (n = 3), IfA17G2R3 (n = 3), IiA17 (n = 3), and IeA11G3T3 (n = 2).

Discussion: The results indicate that known zoonotic Cryptosporidium spp., G. duodenalis, and E. bieneusi are prevalent in crab-eating macaques. The crab-eating macaques could play a potential role in the zoonotic transmission of pathogens to humans.

Keywords: China; Cryptosporidium spp.; Enterocytozoon bieneusi; Giardia duodenalis; crab-eating macaque; zoonosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Phylogenetic relationships of C. hominis subtypes based on maximum likelihood analysis. The subtypes of C. hominis that have been identified in this study are indicated by red triangles. Bootstrap values below 50% are not shown. Bar = 0.5 substitutions per site.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Phylogenetic relationships of E. bieneusi genotypes based on maximum likelihood analysis. The genotypes of E. bieneusi that have been identified in this study are indicated by red triangles. Bootstrap values below 50% are not shown. Bar = 0.1 substitutions per site.

Similar articles

References

    1. Alves M., Xiao L., Sulaiman I., Lal A. A., Matos O., Antunes F. (2003). Subgenotype analysis of Cryptosporidium isolates from humans, cattle, and zoo ruminants in Portugal. J. Clin. Microbiol. 41, 2744–2747. doi: 10.1128/jcm.41.6.2744-2747.2003, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Beck R., Sprong H., Bata I., Lucinger S., Pozio E., Cacciò S. M. (2011). Prevalence and molecular typing of Giardia spp. in captive mammals at the zoo of Zagreb, Croatia. Vet. Parasitol. 175, 40–46. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2010.09.026, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bodager J. R., Parsons M. B., Wright P. C., Rasambainarivo F., Roellig D., Xiao L., et al. (2015). Complex epidemiology and zoonotic potential for Cryptosporidium suis in rural Madagascar. Vet. Parasitol. 207, 140–143. doi: 10.1016/j.vetpar.2014.11.013, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bouzid M., Hunter P. R., Mcdonald V., Elwin K., Chalmers R. M., Tyler K. M. (2013). A new heterogeneous family of telomerically encoded Cryptosporidium proteins. Evol. Appl. 6, 207–217. doi: 10.1111/j.1752-4571.2012.00277.x, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Brynildsrud O., Tysnes K. R., Robertson L. J., Debenham J. J. (2018). Giardia duodenalis in primates: classification and host specificity based on phylogenetic analysis of sequence data. Zoonoses Public Health 65, 637–647. doi: 10.1111/zph.12470, PMID: - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources