Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 29:17:217-229.
doi: 10.2147/OPTO.S525505. eCollection 2025.

The Development and Implementation of a Simulated Patient Resource for Teaching and Assessment in Optometry Low Vision Rehabilitation

Affiliations

The Development and Implementation of a Simulated Patient Resource for Teaching and Assessment in Optometry Low Vision Rehabilitation

Marek Karas et al. Clin Optom (Auckl). .

Abstract

Purpose: To report on the development, evaluation, and acceptability of a simulated patient resource designed for teaching and assessment in low vision rehabilitation. The findings aim to inform possible future integration of this method into optometric education.

Methods: In response to COVID-19 restrictions, a simulated patient resource was developed to allow students undertaking the practical elements of postgraduate modules in low vision practice at Cardiff University to complete their training. Using a mixed methods case study approach, the evaluation examined perspectives from students, assessors, and simulated patients, to establish if there was a consensus of opinion on its use. The study did not seek to demonstrate educational impact or validate SiP against existing methods.

Results: Five assessors, five simulated patients and seven students completed evaluations. Both assessors and students broadly accepted the method for both teaching and assessment, with mean scores across all groups ranging from 7.3 to 9.6 on a 1-10 scale (where 1 indicated very poor acceptance and 10 excellent acceptance). The discussion and establishing magnification elements of the encounter were the least well accepted. Simulated patients found the level of preparation for the role adequate. There were no significant differences between Likert scores between assessors and students in both the teaching and assessment sessions. Thematic analysis of free text comments showed in the main positive responses, with all groups highlighting the benefits of detailed scenarios and pre-session training. The method was acceptable to the professional governing and accrediting body, the College of Optometrists.

Conclusion: Implementing a guideline-compliant simulated patient resource for high-stakes assessment requires significant time and resources. Our single cohort analysis indicates broad acceptance amongst assessors and students. Further research is needed to evaluate its educational impact across a wider range of scenarios and competencies while also further assessing its validity. Though simulated patients offer a viable alternative for teaching and assessing low vision practice, real patient encounters remain preferable.

Keywords: low vision; low vision rehabilitation; optometry; post graduate teaching; simulated patients; simulation-based learning.

Plain language summary

Simulation-based education in healthcare replicates real-life scenarios for teaching purposes. One method used is the simulated patient; these are individuals trained to portray patients with specific health conditions. This approach allows healthcare professionals to develop, practice, and be assessed on their clinical consultation skills. During the COVID-19 pandemic, we developed a program at Cardiff University to train and use simulated patients, enabling eye care practitioners to complete their training in low vision practice. This paper outlines how we used accepted guidelines to design this resource and analyses feedback from students, simulated patients, and teaching staff involved in using it. Our experiences taught us that developing and implementing such a simulated patient resource requires significant time and resources. Even though feedback suggested that the method is mostly acceptable to both assessors and students, we have concluded that having access to a readily available pool of real patients is the more credible option for teaching and assessing this accredited level of low vision practice. However, in the absence of real patients, the use of simulated patients is a viable option for teaching and assessing low vision practice, provided the resource is carefully planned and implemented. We feel that more research is needed to explore how this method could be used effectively and more widely in teaching and assessing other optometric skills.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflicts of interest in this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Domains taught and assessed in the low vision assessment.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Thematic map.

Similar articles

References

    1. Issenberg SB, Scalese RJ. Simulation in health care education. Perspect Biol Med. 2008;51(1):31–46. doi: 10.1353/pbm.2008.0004 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Battista A, Nestel D. Chapter 11: simulation in medical education. In: Swanwick T, Forrest K, editors. Understanding Medical Education. Wiley Blackwell; 2019:p151–162.
    1. Purva M, Fent G, Prakash A, Armstrong M. Enhancing UK core medical training through simulation-based education: an evidence-based approach. A report from the joint JRCPTB/HEE expert group on simulation in core medical training. Health Education England; 2016.
    1. Bearman ML, Nestel DF, Andreatta P. Simulation‑based medical education. In: Walsh K, editor. Oxford Textbook of Medical Education. 1st ed. United Kingdom: Oxford University Press; 2013. pp. 186–197.
    1. Nayahangan LJ, Konge L, Russell L, Andersen S. Training and education of healthcare workers during viral epidemics: a systematic review. BMJ Open. 2021;11(5):e044111. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-044111 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources