Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug;22(229):20250260.
doi: 10.1098/rsif.2025.0260. Epub 2025 Aug 6.

Glandular quinoline-derivates protect crustacean woodlice from spider predation

Affiliations

Glandular quinoline-derivates protect crustacean woodlice from spider predation

Andreas Fischer et al. J R Soc Interface. 2025 Aug.

Abstract

In evolutionary time, aquatic crustaceans colonized land and faced new terrestrial predators such as spiders and ants. We tested the hypothesis that the crustacean terrestrial woodlouse Porcellio scaber produces defensive metabolites that provide protection against terrestrial predators. When attacked by a predator, P. scaber expels proteinaceous secretions from its tegumental glands. Analyses of gland secretion extracts by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry and by liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry revealed four metabolites: methyl 8-hydroxy-quinoline-2-carboxylate, methyl 8-hydroxy-4-methoxy-quinoline-2-carboxylate, methyl 8-(sulfooxy)quinoline-2-carboxylate and methyl 4-methoxy-8-(sulfooxy)quinoline-2-carboxylate, the latter three being natural products not previously known. In behavioural experiments, Steatoda grossa spiders readily preyed on Tenebrio molitor beetles but avoided chemically well-defended P. scaber. When beetles were rendered chemically well-defended by topical applications of either P. scaber gland secretion extract or synthetic metabolites identified in these extracts, spiders rejected the beetles as prey. Our data support the hypothesis that P. scaber produces defensive metabolites against terrestrial predators. We show that the crustacean P. scaber, like many insects, is chemically defended against predators.

Keywords: Oniscidia; antipredator trait; chemical ecology; spider.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

We declare we have no competing interests.

Figures

Chromatographic-mass spectrometric analyses of defensive secretions of P. scaber.
Figure 1.
Chromatographic-mass spectrometric analyses of defensive secretions of Porcellio scaber. (a) Total ion chromatogram (TIC) of GC-MS. (b, c) Electron ionization spectra of (b) methyl 8-hydroxy-quinoline-2-carboxylate (1) and (c) methyl 8-hydroxy-4-methoxy-quinoline-2-carboxylate (2). (d) TIC of HPLC-MS. (e−h) Electrospray ionization spectra of (e, f) methyl 8-(sulfooxy)quinoline-2-carboxylate (9) and 1, and of (g, h) methyl 4-methoxy-8-(sulfooxy)quinoline-2-carboxylate (10) and 2.
Effects of (i) prey type (chemically well-defended P. scaber woodlice or chemically less defended Tenebrio molitor beetles) and (ii) prey treatment
Figure 2.
Effects of (i) prey type (chemically well-defended P. scaber woodlice or chemically less defended T. molitor beetles) and (ii) prey treatment (topical application of beetles with P. scaber gland secretion, synthetic gland metabolites (40 ng) or a water control) on predation by S. grossa false widow spiders. Bars indicate the number of prey being preyed upon and killed (right of 0), or not (left of 0), by the spiders. Metabolites: 1 = methyl 8-hydroxy-quinoline-2-carboxylate; 2 = methyl 8-hydroxy-4-methoxy-quinoline-2-carboxylate; 9 = methyl 8-(sulfooxy)quinoline-2-carboxylate; 10 = methyl 4-methoxy-8-(sulfooxy)quinoline-2-carboxylate. An asterisk (*) denotes a statistically significant difference (Fisher’s exact tests; p < 0.05).

Similar articles

References

    1. Sugiura S. 2020. Predators as drivers of insect defenses. Entomol. Sci. 23, 316–337. ( 10.1111/ens.12423) - DOI
    1. Humphreys RK, Ruxton GD. 2018. Dropping to escape: a review of an under‐appreciated antipredator defence. Biol. Rev. 94, 575–589. ( 10.1111/brv.12466) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blanchard BD, Nakamura A, Cao M, Chen ST, Moreau CS. 2020. Spine and dine: a key defensive trait promotes ecological success in spiny ants. Ecol. Evol. 10, 5852–5863. ( 10.1002/ece3.6322) - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Crofts SB, Stankowich T. 2021. Stabbing spines: a review of the biomechanics and evolution of defensive spines. Integr. Comp. Biol. 61, 655–667. ( 10.1093/icb/icab099) - DOI - PubMed
    1. Dettner K. 2010. Chemical defense and toxins of lower terrestrial and freshwater animals. In Comprehensive natural products II (eds Mander LN, Lui H-W), pp. 387–410. Amsterdam, The Netherlands: Elsevier. ( 10.1016/B978-008045382-8.00100-3) - DOI

LinkOut - more resources