[Research on the protective effects and influencing factors of hearing protection device in different industries]
- PMID: 40764241
- DOI: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240424-00186
[Research on the protective effects and influencing factors of hearing protection device in different industries]
Abstract
Objective: To evaluate the current situation of the protective effect of hearing protection device (HPD) worn by manufacturing workers and discuss their possible influencing factors. Methods: A total of 3634 noisy workers were surveyed and tested. The study conducted surveys of workers on the use of HPD. The 3M(TM) E-A-R Fit(TM) binaural verification system was used to measure the personal attenuation device (PAR) of workers wearing HPD. Results: The M (Q(1), Q(3)) of baseline PAR obtained by 3634 workers was 12 (2, 19) dB. There was a statistically significant difference in baseline PAR among the three types of HPDs (H=336.39, P<0.01) . After pairwise comparison, it was found that the baseline PAR of workers wearing foam earplugs and earmuffs was higher than that of pre-molded earplugs (P<0.01) . There were differences in baseline PAR among workers in different industries (Z=359.73, P<0.01) . Education level, age of using HPD, types of HPDs, noise exposure intensity, with or without knowledge of correct methods, and comfort evaluation were the main factors affecting baseline PAR (P<0.05) . There were 1536 workers (43.4%) failed the baseline PAR test. After the intervention, the median PAR increased significantly from 1 (0, 6) dB (baseline) to 18 (14, 22) dB (after the intervention) (P<0.01) . The follow-up test found that the follow-up PAR of 328 workers was higher than the baseline PAR of the initial test, and the follow-up PAR was higher than the post-intervention PAR of the initial test (P<0.01) . Conclusion: Under the conditions of this study, the protective effect of HPD was affected by factors such as incorrect understanding of wearing methods, exposure to high-intensity noise, low education level, a short period of time of HPD use and low comfort of hearing protectors. The protective effect could be improved through training, optimizing the wearing of hearing protector models, and follow-up interventions. Enterprises should use suitability verification to ensure the correct selection and wearing of noisy workers.
目的: 探讨不同行业工人佩戴护听器的防护效果现状及其可能影响因素。 方法: 于2020年10月至2023年12月,采用方便抽样的方法,抽取不同行业的3 634名噪声作业工人作为调查对象。采用课题组自行设计的调查问卷调查工人护听器使用情况利用3M(TM) E-A-R fit(TM)双耳验证系统测量工人佩戴护听器的个人声衰减值(personal attenuation device,PAR),采用广义线性回归模型探索基线PAR的影响因素。 结果: 3 634名工人佩戴护听器所获得的基线PAR的M(Q(1),Q(3))为12(2,19)dB;三类护听器类型的基线PAR差异有统计学意义(H=336.39,P<0.01);两两比较后,发现佩戴泡棉型耳塞、耳罩的工人基线PAR均高于预成型耳塞(P<0.01)。不同行业的工人基线PAR差异有统计学意义(Z=359.73,P<0.01)。文化水平、护听器佩戴年限、护听器类型、噪声强度、是否知道正确佩戴方法与舒适性评价是影响基线PAR的主要因素。1 536人(占43.4%)未通过基线PAR测试;接受干预后,PAR(P<0.05)由1(0,6)dB(基线)提升至18(14,22)dB(干预后)(P<0.01)。随访测试发现,328名工人的随访PAR高于初次测试基线PAR,随访PAR低于初次测试干预PAR(P<0.01)。 结论: 护听器防护效果受未正确认知佩戴方式、高强度噪声暴露、教育水平低、护听器使用年限及低舒适度等因素影响,建议通过培训、优化护听器型号佩戴及随访干预提升防护效果,企业应借助适合性验证确保接噪工人的正确选配与佩戴。.
Keywords: Hearing protection device; Influencing factors; Noise; Personal attenuation rating; Protection effect.
Similar articles
-
Hearing protection field attenuation estimation systems and associated training for reducing workers' exposure to noise.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 17;5(5):CD015066. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015066.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024. PMID: 38757544 Free PMC article.
-
Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 7;7(7):CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017. PMID: 28685503 Free PMC article.
-
[Analysis of influencing factors on the protective effect of hearing protectors for noise workers in the petrochemical industry].Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2025 Jul 20;43(7):513-517. doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20240229-00076. Zhonghua Lao Dong Wei Sheng Zhi Ye Bing Za Zhi. 2025. PMID: 40764242 Chinese.
-
Interventions to prevent occupational noise-induced hearing loss.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 Oct 17;10:CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Jul 07;7:CD006396. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006396.pub4. PMID: 23076923 Updated.
-
The protective effect of wearing hearing protection devices in noise-induced hearing loss and its potential influencing factors in the Chinese adult population.Sci Total Environ. 2025 Feb 10;964:178507. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2025.178507. Epub 2025 Jan 28. Sci Total Environ. 2025. PMID: 39869967
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous