Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 5;15(1):28584.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-10430-2.

Reduced risk of lymphedema after immediate breast reconstruction in breast cancer: a retrospective nationwide study

Affiliations

Reduced risk of lymphedema after immediate breast reconstruction in breast cancer: a retrospective nationwide study

Jung Soo Lee et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

This study assessed the impact of immediate breast reconstruction on lymphedema incidence in women diagnosed with breast cancer. We included 45,734 women aged ≥ 30 years treated for breast cancer (ICD-10 primary diagnostic code C50) since 2017. Propensity score-matched analysis compared patients who underwent immediate reconstruction (n = 5,256; stratified into implant and autologous groups), with those who did not (n = 5,256). Multivariate-adjusted extended Cox regression was used to assess lymphedema outcomes. Lymphedema incidences were similar between the immediate reconstruction (22.50%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 19.60-25.30%) and no reconstruction groups (25.30%; 95% CI: 22.50-28.00%; P = 0.180). After adjusting for age, surgery type, treatments, and comorbidities, immediate reconstruction showed an inverse association with lymphedema (adjusted hazard ratio [HR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.69-0.85). When stratified by reconstruction method, implant reconstruction exhibited a reduced risk (adjusted HR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.67-0.82), while autologous reconstruction showed a higher risk (adjusted HR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.39-2.78) for lymphedema. Immediate implant-based reconstruction may lower lymphedema risk, but interpretation requires caution due to potential selection bias, missing data on BMI, breast size, and applicability beyond East Asian populations. Further research with detailed patient information is needed to confirm clinical implications.

Keywords: Breast cancer lymphedema; Breast implants; Breast neoplasms; Mammaplasty; Risk factors.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow diagram of the data mining process scheme.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
The cumulative incidence of lymphedema by immediate breast reconstruction status.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
The cumulative incidence of lymphedema by the type of immediate breast reconstruction.

Similar articles

References

    1. Giaquinto, A. N. et al. Breast Cancer Statistics, 2022. CA Cancer J. Clin72, 524–541 (2022). - PubMed
    1. Waks, A. G. & Winer, E. P. Breast Cancer treatment: A review. JAMA321, 288–300 (2019). - PubMed
    1. McLaughlin, S. A., Brunelle, C. L. & Taghian, A. Breast Cancer-Related lymphedema: risk factors, screening, management, and the impact of locoregional treatment. J. Clin. Oncol.38, 2341–2350 (2020). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Togawa, K. et al. Self-reported symptoms of arm lymphedema and health-related quality of life among female breast cancer survivors. Sci. Rep.11, 10701 (2021). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nguyen, T. T., Hoskin, T. L., Habermann, E. B., Cheville, A. L. & Boughey, J. C. Breast Cancer-Related lymphedema risk is related to multidisciplinary treatment and not surgery alone: results from a large cohort study. Ann. Surg. Oncol.24, 2972–2980 (2017). - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources