Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 5;25(1):316.
doi: 10.1186/s12880-025-01669-2.

Enhancing pediatric distal radius fracture detection: optimizing YOLOv8 with advanced AI and machine learning techniques

Affiliations

Enhancing pediatric distal radius fracture detection: optimizing YOLOv8 with advanced AI and machine learning techniques

Farid Amirouche et al. BMC Med Imaging. .

Abstract

Background: In emergency departments, residents and physicians interpret X-rays to identify fractures, with distal radius fractures being the most common in children. Skilled radiologists typically ensure accurate readings in well-resourced hospitals, but rural areas often lack this expertise, leading to lower diagnostic accuracy and potential delays in treatment. Machine learning systems offer promising solutions by detecting subtle features that non-experts might miss. Recent advancements, including YOLOv8 and its attention-mechanism models, YOLOv8-AM, have shown potential in automated fracture detection. This study aims to refine the YOLOv8-AM model to improve the detection of distal radius fractures in pediatric patients by integrating targeted improvements and new attention mechanisms.

Methods: We enhanced the YOLOv8-AM model to improve pediatric wrist fracture detection, maintaining the YOLOv8 backbone while integrating attention mechanisms such as the Convolutional Block Attention Module (CBAM) and the Global Context (GC) block. We optimized the model through hyperparameter tuning, implementing data cleaning, augmentation, and normalization techniques using the GRAZPEDWRI-DX dataset. This process addressed class imbalances and significantly improved model performance, with mean Average Precision (mAP) increasing from 63.6 to 66.32%.

Results and discussion: The iYOLOv8 models demonstrated substantial improvements in performance metrics. The iYOLOv8 + GC model achieved the highest precision at 97.2%, with an F1-score of 67% and an mAP50 of 69.5%, requiring only 3.62 h of training time. In comparison, the iYOLOv8 + ECA model reached 96.7% precision, significantly reducing training time from 8.54 to 2.16 h. The various iYOLOv8-AM models achieved an average accuracy of 96.42% in fracture detection, although performance for detecting bone anomalies and soft tissues was lower due to dataset constraints. The improvements highlight the model's effectiveness in pathological detection of the pediatric distal radius, suggesting that integrating these AI models into clinical practice could significantly enhance diagnostic efficiency.

Conclusion: Our improved YOLOv8-AM model, incorporating the GC attention mechanism, demonstrated superior speed and accuracy in pediatric distal radius fracture detection while reducing training time. Future research should explore additional features to further enhance detection capabilities in other musculoskeletal areas, as this model has the potential to adapt to various fracture types with appropriate training.

Clinical trial number: Not applicable.

Keywords: AI and wrist fracture; Automated detection; Convolution block attention module (CBAM); Distal and radius fracture; Global context block; Pediatric fracture; YOLOv8-AM.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: Not applicable, since the study includes de-identified data available online. Consent for publication: Not applicable, since the study includes de-identified data available online. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
iYOLOv8-AM simplified architecture
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(A-D): Visual Comparison of Fracture Detection Using iYOLOv8-AM Model Variants: (A) No fracture detected; (B) Fracture detected; (C) Periosteal bone reaction detected; (D) Fracture and periosteal bone reaction detected
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Refined GC block key structure
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Precision-recall curves (PRC) for the various iYOLOv8-AM models across different categories in the GRAZPEDWRI-DX dataset
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
(A-B): Performance of iYOLOv8_AM model variants in 10-fold cross-validation for (A) mAP50 overall detection, (B) precision fracture detection
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
Potential future applications of the iYOLOv8_AM in fracture detection throughout the whole body

Similar articles

References

    1. Hedström EM, Svensson O, Bergström U, Michno P. Epidemiology of fractures in children and adolescents. Acta Orthop. 2010;81:148–53. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Miele V, Galluzzo M, Trinci M. Missed fractures in the emergency department. In: Romano L, Pinto A, editors. Errors in radiology. Milano: Springer Milan; 2012. pp. 39–50.
    1. Rimmer A. Radiologist shortage leaves patient care at risk, warns Royal college. BMJ. 2017;359:j4683. - PubMed
    1. Berlin L. Defending the missed radiographic diagnosis. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2001;176:317–22. - PubMed
    1. Mounts J, Clingenpeel J, McGuire E, Byers E, Kireeva Y. Most frequently missed fractures in the emergency department. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2011;50:183–6. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources