Effectiveness and safety of oral vancomycin in non-primary sclerosing cholangitis paediatric inflammatory bowel disease
- PMID: 40764635
- DOI: 10.1002/jpn3.70180
Effectiveness and safety of oral vancomycin in non-primary sclerosing cholangitis paediatric inflammatory bowel disease
Abstract
Objectives: Oral vancomycin (OV) has limited usage in paediatric inflammatory bowel disease (PIBD) with reported efficacy in primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC-PIBD), acute severe colitis as part of quadruple-antibiotic regimen, and very early-onset IBD. This study evaluates OV effectiveness and safety as a single-agent in non-PSC PIBD.
Methods: This single-centre retrospective study included patients on OV for active disease or steroid/topical therapy dependency. Exclusion criteria were PSC diagnosis, Clostridioides difficile infection, induction treatment started <3 weeks prior, and OV as part of quadruple-antibiotic regimen. Disease activity was assessed at baseline, 1-, 3-, 6- and 12-months. OV was started at 250/125 mg (≥30/<30 kg), three or four times daily, and tapered in responders after ≥1 month.
Results: Thirty-one patients (16 males; median age 15.1 years, IQR:11.7-16.6) were included: 23 ulcerative colitis (UC), 4 IBD-unclassified (IBDU) and 4 Crohn's disease. OV dosing was 17.5 mg/kg/day (IQR: 15.3-21.6) for 4 months (IQR: 1-9). Clinical and biochemical remission was achieved or maintained in 17/31 (55%), with 15/17 reducing/stopping other treatments and two remaining on OV monotherapy. Conversely, 14/31 (45%) discontinued OV due to non-response (11/14) or intolerance (3/14), the majority (11/14) within 1 month. Responders had lower baseline clinical disease activity and platelet count (p < 0.05). At 1-month faecal calprotectin dropped from 686 to 60 μg/g in responders (p = 0.001) but remained high in nonresponders. No serious adverse events occurred.
Conclusion: OV was rapidly effective in 55% of PIBD cases, enabling 48% to reduce or stop other treatments. It proved most beneficial in mildly active UC/IBDU as an induction strategy plus a maintenance option for some, with a role in others in treatment de-escalation.
Keywords: Crohn's disease; antibiotics; inflammatory bowel disease unclassified; ulcerative colitis.
© 2025 European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.
References
REFERENCES
-
- Kellermayer R, Zilbauer M. The gut microbiome and the triple environmental hit concept of inflammatory bowel disease pathogenesis. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2020;71:589‐595. doi:10.1097/MPG.0000000000002908
-
- Ananthakrishnan AN, Bernstein CN, Iliopoulos D, et al. Environmental triggers in IBD: a review of progress and evidence. Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018;15:39‐49.
-
- Gionchetti P. Antibiotics and probiotics in treatment of inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol. 2006;12:3306‐3313.
-
- Khan KJ, Ullman TA, Ford AC, et al. Antibiotic therapy in inflammatory bowel disease: a systematic review and meta‐analysis. Am J Gastroenterol. 2011;106:661‐673. doi:10.1038/ajg.2011.72
-
- Segal JP, Ding NS, Worley G, et al. Systematic review with meta‐analysis: the management of chronic refractory pouchitis with an evidence‐based treatment algorithm. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2017;45:581‐592. doi:10.1111/apt.13905
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
