Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 5;15(1):28623.
doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-13766-x.

Positive lymph node ratio as a nodal staging system to avoid stage migration between remnant and primary proximal gastric cancers

Affiliations

Positive lymph node ratio as a nodal staging system to avoid stage migration between remnant and primary proximal gastric cancers

Daiki Matsubara et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Nodal staging of gastric cancer (GC) based on the number of positive lymph nodes (PLNs) is a robust prognostic factor. However, the number of retrieved lymph nodes in remnant GC (RGC) may be lower than in primary GC owing to variations in the extents of initial gastrectomy and lymphadenectomy. This study evaluated stage migration between RGC and primary proximal gastric cancer (PGC) and the clinical usefulness of the PLN ratio (PLNR) in mitigating stage migration. Among 4,142 patients who underwent gastrectomy, 91 with RGC and 768 with PGC at pStage I-III were retrospectively analyzed. A PLNR of 0.3 was the best-stratified prognosis (p < 0.001). Five-year survival in pN1-3 RGC was worse than in PGC, whereas pN0 showed no prognostic difference. PLNR stratification (0, < 0.3, and ≥ 0.3) effectively distinguished prognosis in patients with RGC (82.2, 46.6, 12.7%, respectively) and PGC (88.9, 63.4, 16.4%, respectively). High PLNR (≥ 0.3) was an independent prognostic factor in RGC (HR: 2.76, 95% CI: 1.06-7.17, p = 0.036), whereas pN stage was not. Prognostic stratification was reliable with at least five dissected lymph nodes. PLNR provides effective prognostic stratification in RGC and helps evaluate stage migration between RGC and primary PGC.

Keywords: Gastric cancer; Positive lymph-node ratio; Proximal; Remnant.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Survival curves for pStage I–III RGC and PGC according to pN stage. (a) Survival curves for RGC in each pN stage. (b) Survival curves for PGC in each pN stage. (c) Survival curves for patients with RGC without lymph node metastasis and those with more than one lymph node metastasis. RGC, remnant gastric cancer; PGC, proximal gastric cancer.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Survival curves for pStage I–III RGC and PGC according to PLNR. (a) Survival curve for RGC using the cut-off value 0.3. (b) Survival curve for PGC using the cut-off value 0.3. (c) Survival curve for RGC using the cut-off value (PLNR 0, PLNR 0 – < 0.3, PLNR ≥ 0.3). (d) Survival curve for PGC using the cut-off value (PLNR 0, PLNR 0 – < 0.3, PLNR ≥ 0.3). RGC, remnant gastric cancer; PGC, proximal gastric cancer; PLNR, positive lymph node ratio.

Similar articles

References

    1. Dicken, B. J. et al. Gastric adenocarcinoma: review and considerations for future directions. Ann. Surg.241, 27–39 (2005). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartgrink, H. H., Jansen, E. P., van Grieken, N. C. & van de Velde C J. Gastric Cancer Lancet374, 477–490 (2009). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Komatsu, S. & Otsuji, E. Essential updates 2017/2018: recent topics in the treatment and research of gastric cancer in Japan. Ann. Gastroenterol. Surg.3, 581–591 (2019). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Okajima, W. et al. Prognostic impact of the number of retrieved lymph nodes in patients with gastric cancer. J. Gastroenterol. Hepatol.31, 1566–1571 (2016). - PubMed
    1. Sinning, C., Schaefer, N., Standop, J., Hirner, A. & Wolff, M. Gastric stump carcinoma - epidemiology and current concepts in pathogenesis and treatment. Eur. J. Surg. Oncol.33, 133–139 (2007). - PubMed