Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Aug 5;26(1):177.
doi: 10.1186/s10194-025-02127-8.

Small-molecule CGRP antagonist atogepant does not affect cortical spreading depression susceptibility in rats

Affiliations

Small-molecule CGRP antagonist atogepant does not affect cortical spreading depression susceptibility in rats

Xuyan Jin et al. J Headache Pain. .

Abstract

Background: Atogepant is a small-molecule non-competitive calcitonin gene-related peptide (CGRP) receptor antagonist efficacious in preventing episodic migraine. Cortical spreading depolarization (CSD) is a slowly propagating depolarization wave underlying migraine aura. We investigated whether the efficacy of atogepant in migraine is mediated by CSD suppression.

Method: We used Sprague-Dawley rats (n = 28 males, 28 females) to determine the electrical stimulation intensity threshold for CSD induction and the frequency of CSDs induced by continuous topical 1 M KCl application sequentially in the same animal, using intracortical glass microelectrodes under isoflurane anesthesia and full systemic physiological monitoring, including arterial blood pressure and blood gases. In a separate cohort, we disrupted the BBB by inducing three CSDs in the contralateral hemisphere using 1 M KCl daily for 2 days before CSD susceptibility testing. Both cohorts received atogepant (30 mg/kg, once daily oral gavage) or vehicle for four days. CSD susceptibility was examined 1 h after the last atogepant dose.

Results: Atogepant did not affect the CSD threshold, frequency, propagation speed, amplitude, or duration compared with vehicle, either without or with preceding CSDs. Systemic physiological parameters did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: These data suggest that atogepant efficacy in migraine is not mediated via CSD suppression, even when BBB permeability is increased.

Keywords: Atogepant; Blood-brain barrier; CGRP; Migraine; Spreading depression.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Declarations. Competing interests: Pradeep Banerjee is an employee of AbbVie, which provided atogepant for this study. All other authors declare no competing interests.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
CSD susceptibility following atogepant administration. Experimental timeline. Schematic illustration of burr hole placement and representative traces of CSD recordings. The upper row shows the threshold, propagation speed, duration, and amplitude of CSDs induced by electrical stimulation in the right hemisphere. The lower row shows the topical 1 M KCl-induced CSD frequency, propagation speed, duration, and amplitude in the left hemisphere. CSD threshold, frequency, and propagation speed were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. CSD duration and amplitude were analyzed using two-way ANOVA
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
CSD susceptibility following atogepant administration after BBB disruption. Experimental timeline. B and Schematic illustration of burr hole placement and representative traces of CBF and CSD recordings. The upper row shows the threshold, propagation speed, duration, and amplitude of CSDs induced by electrical stimulation in the right hemisphere. The lower row shows the topical 1 M KCl-induced CSD frequency, propagation speed, duration, and amplitude in the right hemisphere. CSD threshold, frequency, and propagation speed were analyzed using the Mann-Whitney test. CSD duration and amplitude were analyzed using two-way ANOVA
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
CSD-induced CBF responses following atogepant administration. Experimental timeline. Schematic illustration of burr hole placement and representative traces of CBF and CSD recordings. Average CSD-induced CBF responses compared between the vehicle and atogepant groups in both hemispheres. CBF was analyzed using two-way ANOVA

Similar articles

References

    1. Lipton RB, Bigal ME, Diamond M et al (2007) Migraine prevalence, disease burden, and the need for preventive therapy. Neurology 68:343–349 - PubMed
    1. Puledda F, Silva EM, Suwanlaong K et al (2023) Migraine: from pathophysiology to treatment. J Neurol 270:3654–3666 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Andreou AP, Edvinsson L (2019) Mechanisms of migraine as a chronic evolutive condition. J Headache Pain 20:117 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Edvinsson L, Villalón CM, MaassenVanDenBrink A (2012) Basic mechanisms of migraine and its acute treatment. Pharmacol Ther 136:319–333 - PubMed
    1. Russo AF, Hay DL (2023) CGRP physiology, pharmacology, and therapeutic targets: migraine and beyond. Physiol Rev 103:1565–1644 - PMC - PubMed

Substances

LinkOut - more resources