Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Sep;37(9):e70066.
doi: 10.1111/jne.70066. Epub 2025 Aug 5.

Prolactin-adjusted inferior petrosal sinus sampling: Pituitary and ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone-dependent Cushing syndrome

Affiliations

Prolactin-adjusted inferior petrosal sinus sampling: Pituitary and ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone-dependent Cushing syndrome

Vera E Sprenkeler et al. J Neuroendocrinol. 2025 Sep.

Abstract

Inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) is a diagnostic procedure used to differentiate between ectopic adrenocorticotropic hormone (ACTH)-dependent Cushing syndrome (EAS) and pituitary ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome (CD). This study investigated the diagnostic value of IPSS, focusing on the use of prolactin adjustments and different calculation methods. We retrospectively analyzed data from patients with ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome and inconclusive pituitary-MRI who underwent IPSS with corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH) stimulation between 2015 and 2025. The cohort included 19 patients (16 CD, 3 EAS), with diagnoses confirmed by pathology examination and/or biochemical remission 1 year post-surgery. A pituitary source was confirmed in all patients with CD (n = 16) through pathology and/or biochemical remission. An ectopic source was confirmed by pathology in two of three patients with EAS. Using unadjusted ACTH ratios and previously established cut-off values resulted in three incorrect diagnoses out of 20 procedures. In contrast, prolactin-adjusted peak ACTH ratios provided a more distinct separation between CD and EAS, enabling correct diagnosis in all cases. Optimal cut-off values determined by receiver operating characteristic curve analysis were 1.0 for basal and 1.7 for concurrent prolactin-adjusted peak ACTH ratios, yielding 100% sensitivity and specificity. Basal prolactin-adjusted peak ACTH ratios were >1.5 in all patients with CD and <0.6 in all patients with EAS, while concurrent ratios were >1.1 in all patients with CD and <0.3 in all patients with EAS. Prolactin-adjusted peak ACTH ratios improve the diagnostic accuracy of IPSS and can effectively differentiate between ectopic and pituitary sources of ACTH. This study enhances the diagnostic accuracy of inferior petrosal sinus sampling (IPSS) for differentiating pituitary from ectopic ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome by incorporating prolactin measurements and exploring various calculation methods. The findings contribute to advancing diagnostic techniques and improving clinical management of endocrine disorders. By enabling more accurate identification of the underlying cause of ACTH-dependent Cushing syndrome, this work supports clinicians in selecting optimal treatment strategies.

Keywords: ACTH hypersecretion; petrosal sinus sampling; prolactin adjustment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
During IPSS, blood samples are obtained simultaneously from the left inferior petrosal sinus, right inferior petrosal sinus, and femoral vein at the following time points: −5 min, t 0, +1½ min, +5 min, +10 min, +15 min, and +20 min.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Distribution of the (unadjusted) ACTH ratios shown separately for the patients with pituitary ACTH‐dependent (A) and ectopic ACTH‐dependent Cushing syndrome (B). In (C) the lower section of (A) is shown, illustrating the crucial data points.
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
Distribution of the prolactin‐adjusted ACTH ratios calculated by different methods, shown separately for the patients with pituitary ACTH‐dependent (A) and ectopic ACTH‐dependent Cushing syndrome (B). In (C) the lower section of (A) is shown, illustrating the crucial data points; Method 1: Basal prolactin‐adjusted peak ACTH ratio. Method 2: Concurrent prolactin‐adjusted peak ACTH ratio. Method 3: Basal prolactin‐adjusted ACTH ratio. Method 4: Concurrent prolactin‐adjusted ACTH ratio.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve for unadjusted ACTH ratios (A), basal prolactin‐adjusted peak ACTH ratios (B) and concurrent prolactin‐adjusted peak ACTH ratios (C).

References

    1. Lacroix A, Feelders RA, Stratakis CA, Nieman LK. Cushing's syndrome. Lancet. 2015;386(9996):913‐927. - PubMed
    1. Qiao X, Ye H, Zhang X, et al. The value of prolactin in inferior petrosal sinus sampling with desmopressin stimulation in Cushing's disease. Endocrine. 2015;48(2):644‐652. - PubMed
    1. Newell‐Price J, Bertagna X, Grossman AB, Nieman LK. Cushing's syndrome. Lancet. 2006;367(9522):1605‐1617. - PubMed
    1. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, et al. The diagnosis of Cushing's syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008;93(5):1526‐1540. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nieman LK, Biller BM, Findling JW, et al. Treatment of Cushing's syndrome: an endocrine society clinical practice guideline. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2015;100(8):2807‐2831. - PMC - PubMed