Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2025 Jul 22:16:1539085.
doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2025.1539085. eCollection 2025.

Bringing back psychological empowerment in empowerment-oriented leadership: the development of the Psychological Empowerment Leadership Scale (PELS)

Affiliations

Bringing back psychological empowerment in empowerment-oriented leadership: the development of the Psychological Empowerment Leadership Scale (PELS)

Carsten C Schermuly et al. Front Psychol. .

Abstract

Empowering leadership has garnered significant attention over the past two decades, driven by the evolving dynamics of organizations. However, current measures of empowering leadership often fail to align with the psychological empowerment construct (Spreitzer, 1995) - the very construct these leadership practices claim to impact - and exhibit some psychometric flaws. To address these issues, we introduce the Psychological Empowerment Leadership Scale (PELS), designed to assess leader behaviors fostering psychological empowerment across six dimensions. We used automated item selection algorithms to ensure high psychometric quality and tested the instrument's validity and measurement invariance in German and US samples. A second study with two measurement points, assessed the criterion-oriented validity of the PELS. Confirmatory factor analyses support its factorial validity and indicate metric measurement invariance across both countries. The PELS shows strong correlations with psychological empowerment, job satisfaction, and emotional exhaustion, often exceeding previous meta-analyses, thus demonstrating criterion validity. However, its association with innovative behaviors was lower than expected, warranting further research. With only 24 items, the PELS, offers high reliability and stability over time, providing a more efficient tool for assessing empowering leadership and aligning better with contemporary theoretical perspectives. This research refines the conceptualization and assessment of empowering leadership in contemporary organizational contexts.

Keywords: PELS; automated item-selection; empowering leadership; factorial validity; psychological empowerment; psychometric quality.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

References

    1. Aguinis H., Villamor I., Ramani R. S. (2021). MTurk research: review and recommendations. J. Manag. 47, 823–837. doi: 10.1177/0149206320969787 - DOI
    1. Algner M., Lorenz T. (2022). You’re prettier when you smile: construction and validation of a questionnaire to assess microaggressions against women in the workplace. Front. Psychol. 13. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.809862, PMID: - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ambrose M. L., Schminke M., Mayer D. M. (2013). Trickle-down effects of supervisor perceptions of interactional justice: a moderated mediation approach. J. Appl. Psychol. 98, 678–689. doi: 10.1037/a0032080, PMID: - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amundsen S., Martinsen Ø. L. (2014). Empowering leadership: construct clarification, conceptualization, and validation of a new scale. Leadersh. Q. 25, 487–511. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.009 - DOI
    1. Arnold J. A., Arad S., Rhoades J. A., Drasgow F. (2000). The empowering leadership questionnaire: the construction and validation of a new scale for measuring leader behaviors. J. Organ. Behav. 21, 249–269. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1379(200005)21:3<249::AID-JOB10>3.0.CO;2-# - DOI

LinkOut - more resources